Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | executesorder66's commentslogin

No, you completely had it correct. And sending an AI response to a question is the same semi-rude way to respond.

The context here is that the person logging the ticket (or asking the original question by using AI to do it) is the one who is ALSO being a lazy piece of shit, and deserves and equally lazy useless response in the form of a LMGTFY or AI response, because they were too lazy to actually think about their original query and spend time to craft a succinct but useful ticket/query.


That first bot _did_ actually use an em dash in a comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47170066


So what actual problem do NFT artists work to solve?


Boredom


Why?


> "your child wearing a mask makes me uncomfortable"

What about that could possibly make someone uncomfortable. How does it have any effect on the other parent?


So that cloudflare can now MITM their HTTPS encryption. /s


Lol, then don't use Windows. Why anyone trusts their personal data to closed source software, and especially closed source software by an empirically hostile corporation like Microsoft is beyond me.


A Cloudflare fronted website can't handle HN frontpage levels of traffic?

Then why does anybody use cloudflare?


Probably bad cache headers configuration. Even with Cloudflare in front it could be forwarding every request to the backend if the cache headers are misconfigured...


>"Windows but with even less reliability and more security problems plus tech debt"

To me that just sound like it will make ReactOS much more Windows-like. So it's probably a win for the project. \s


>For example, the main "customer" of the module system is the JDK itself

As mentioned in TFA, "The general advice seems to be that modules are (should be) an internal detail of the JRE and best ignored in application code"

So yeah, why expose it to those who are not the "main customer"?


> So yeah, why expose it to those who are not the "main customer"?

How did modules affect you as a user? I'd guess that you had to add `--add-opens`/`--add-exports` during one of the JDK migrations at some point. And the reason you had to do it was that various libraries on your classpath used JDK internal APIs. So modules provided encapsulation and gave you an escape hatch for when you still have to use those libraries. How else would you do it while still achieving the desired goal?


It’s just too complex. They should have went with the internal modifier.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: