Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fooker's commentslogin

Because you are not prepared for the poverty that follows from an economy stalling.

This logic would fly a couple of years ago.

Since then, we have seen indiscriminate violence against people and families following the rules.

And a bizzare hate campaign against H1B.

And court judgements explicitly enabling masked government agents to target someone solely on the basis of skin color.


> Since then, we have seen indiscriminate violence against people and families following the rules.

I'm not aware of any such thing, especially anything "indiscriminate". For sure there are causalities when protests go from speech to violence or directly interfere with the ability of law enforcement to enforce the law. But your framing makes it sound like roving bands of beat down squads.

> And a bizzare hate campaign against H1B.

There's nothing bizarre about workers being angry at a system that is being abused to drive down wages. The reality is that there are segments of workforce in the USA that will only hire H1Bs workers because they know they can treat them illegally. This happens all over the place but is particularly prevalent at larger orgs (both in tech and finance). The behavior is implicitly authorized by the companies as they outsource the "being the jerk" to those managers.

The non-H1B workers rightfully feel angered by this because it directly lowers their wages. It's like scabs flooding a union shop. Only worse as the scabs are scared of not only losing their jobs, but their visas.

> And court judgements explicitly enabling masked government agents to target someone solely on the basis of skin color.

If there was not a concerted effort to interfere with law enforcement or dox the people that work at those places, the masks would not be necessary.


> I'm not aware of any such thing, especially anything "indiscriminate"

Ok, let me make you aware of it and then you'll be unable to continue to use this excuse.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26871634-19-ts-of-02...

> Detention without lawful authority is not just a technical defect, it is a constitutional injury that unfairly falls on the heads of those who have done nothing wrong to justify it. The individuals affected are people. The overwhelming majority of the hundreds seen by this Court have been found to be lawfully present as of now in the country.

Quit burying your head in the sand of what is happening around you. I urge you to actually read the reality in the court records of what is actually happening.

> That does not end the Court’s concerns, however. Attached to this order is an appendix that identifies 96 court orders that ICE has violated in 74 cases. The extent of ICE’s noncompliance is almost certainly substantially understated. This list is confined to orders issued since January 1, 2026, and the list was hurriedly compiled by extraordinarily busy judges. Undoubtedly, mistakes were made, and orders that should have appeared on this list were omitted. This list should give pause to anyone—no matter his or her political beliefs—who cares about the rule of law. ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230...


> I'm not aware of any such thing, especially anything "indiscriminate".

You are wilfully unaware.

> For sure there are causalities when protests go from speech to violence or directly interfere with the ability of law enforcement to enforce the law.

The protests and other resistance to the crackdowns have been amazingly disciplined in maintaining nonviolence. Shockingly good at it.

Almost all of the violence that's actually happened has been both started and finished by ICE/CBP/etc.

Not to mention the fact that the structure of the operations, and the organizational culture in which they are conducted, are obviously intended, at a command level, to create conditions for violence on both (all?) sides. And, yes, Those In Charge are absolutely responsible for that.

When Noem, Bondi, Homan, Miller, Trump, and friends talk about "violent riots", "domestic terrorism", "ramming agents with cars", or whatever, they are lying. It's not a difference of interpretation. They are intentionally lying (except maybe Trump, who probably doesn't have enough of a sense of reality to be strictly lying). They have lots of allies who systematically spread their lies and add more. Don't believe anything they say unless you have personally seen and authenticated video. You have to authenticate it, because one of their favorite tricks is to use video of things that happened years ago, sometimes in other countries, and claim it's what their agents are reacting to. AI video isn't quite good enough yet, but they'll use that where they can. And of course they're also all about selective editing. And after all that they still ask you to ignore the evidence of your own eyes.

If you are failing to be skeptical of notorious baldfaced liars, that's motivated ignorance on your part.

> But your framing makes it sound like roving bands of beat down squads.

In Minneapolis, yes. But those squads are mostly aimed at intimidating anybody resisting the agenda, not at actual potential deportees.

The more on-topic problem is revoking every completely legal status in sight, and then acting as though the people whose status got revoked had done something wrong.

> If there was not a concerted effort to interfere with law enforcement or dox the people that work at those places, the masks would not be necessary.

You know, normal cops frequently deal with actual violent criminals who may be inclined to violent vengeance. But they don't wear masks.

ICE agents are just going to have to deal with the fact that, so long as they keep doing what they're doing, decent people who find out who they are are going to shun them. They might even get heckled on the streets. Comes with the territory. Does not justify trying to conceal your identity.


If we don't get into a world war, sure.

What would it take to generate visualizations like this automagically?

https://viewfinderpanoramas.org/panoramas/ASIA/EVEREST-SOUTH...


I don't know, but I really want to do it.

Here's a potential bug report, but maybe it comes down to the resolution.

There seems to be some missing data here when it comes to the north face of most Himalayan peaks (for example: Annapurna).

I am willing to believe looking south gives you the longer view, but there has to be some points on the north faces that win out for a northern view.

Fun fact, the view north is so far, clear and reliable weather-wise that the CIA partnered with mountaineers to set up equipment to monitor China's progress with nuclear weapons several decades ago.


Could you post a link to a view that you think might not be right?


I see, thanks. So my thinking is that overly dark areas to the North are caused by _relatively_ low visibility. The heatmap is actually dynamically generated for every viewport. So I agree that there has to be some amazing view from those North faces, it's just that they are drowned out by the sheer enormity of the views on the South face.

If were to use absolute global values for the heatmap, then the Himalayas would just appear as pure, washed-out white.

Does that make sense?


This has been a well integrated feature in cursor for six months.

As a rule of thumb, almost every solution you come up with after thirty seconds of thought for a online discussion, has been considered by people doing the same thing for a living.


This is so cool!

Fun fact, Tiny C Compiler was derived from such a C compiler submitted to the the International Obfuscated C Code Contest.

https://www.ioccc.org/2001/bellard/index.html


Further Fun fact, that submission was called OTCC. I reverse engineered it and that provided inspiration for SectorC.

https://xorvoid.com/otcc_deobfuscated.html https://github.com/xorvoid/otcc_deobfuscated


Meh, I did an entire awk interpreter in two lines:

  #!/bin/sh
  echo "awk: bailing out" >&2

And this is exactly why coding with AI is not-so-slowly taking over.

Most people think they are more capable than they actually are.


Yes, clang is famously in this category.

If you copy the clang binary to a random place in your filesystem, it will fail to compile programs that include standard headers.


I have burned through more than my salary in AI API calls and nobody seems to care!

I’d guess that there’s at least one person at your company who has bragged about it.

You're not burning hard enough -- aim for 2x!

In a big tech company you have heard of, this is being used as a criteria for handing out promotions.

Finally a good definition of 10x developer!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: