Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | franczesko's commentslogin

Why only pixel phones are supported?

Because phones have device-specific code. Effectively, each single model is running its own fork of Android. Naturally, Google has no incentive to change this - it makes it difficult to update (planned obsolescence) and install other software (like GrapheneOS).

Because google actually cares about hardware and software security. Read the FAQ: https://grapheneos.org/faq#supported-devices

>Because google actually cares about hardware and software security.

That statement might not have aged so well, especially consindering googles attempt to lock out apps from their devices, If the developers do not comply with being oficially registered.


There is a difference between security and privacy or freedom of use. Locking down the device to only allow a subset of apps that Google has some control over (by requiring developers to register) is a measure that can increase security, even though it obviously takes some control away from the end-user.

The fact that the play store is not exactly known for exceptionally high standards w.r.t. malware, or that there are lots of valid concerns that come along with a company controlling who is allowed to supply apps for the device is a different topic.


That's not at all what Google announced.

It has nothing to do with devices. It has to do with OSes, most notably OSes certified by Google, which GrapheneOS isn't.

Also, it will be possible to bypass it even on certified OSes.


Don't mix security and freedom. They're commonly opposed to each other.

This is true, I don't get the downvotes.

I believe (as it's open source) there is nothing impeding anybody else to compile grapheneOS in a samsung S10, which would not be as secure, but should still work as any lineage

However I haven't seen anybody try


They are working with a partner to get their own phone hardware, hopefully by next year.

We should ask ourselves a question, if the system we're living in is not rewarding having kids, is a good system at all?


With this logic, one should pay Google for making purchases in their browser or Netflix should pay e.g. Samsung a fee, as users consume content on their devices. Truly ridiculous.


I wouldn't mind and wouldn't be surprised by Valve phone at some point


Another way to fix it, is to ban real estate as a financial speculation tool


>Valve gets a large target market

They don't need Apple for that. People who game already game elsewhere. Steam on Apple feels pointless. I wouldn't be surprised, if Valve will go for smartphones with their own at some point


This is really the endgame, I think. A modern smartphone with a controller attached is effectively the same as a Steam Deck or Switch 2, just with a different OS. Apple has been pushing higher-end games on phones lately (this year has seen iOS versions of Hitman 3, Sniper Elite 4, and Subnautica), and reports are that the new pro phones run them well (the limiting factor being thermal load).

A phone that can run my Steam library is super-compelling -- I travel a decent amount, so being able to chuck something smaller like a Backbone One in my bag vs. a Steam Deck would be a meaningful change.


Long time ago, I've really enjoyed a course by David Evans from Virginia University about building a search engine and concepts of computer science.

Building a "classic" search engine is a very fun project to go through.

https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/courses/cs101/

List: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nkR2LLPiYo&list=PLAwxTw4SYa...

Dave's profile: https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/


I took this one as well - even as a new programmer is was really engaging and information-dense.


Unless MS opens up Xboxes for actual gamers (which won't happen). Pity, as Series X is very capable


I have the exact opposite. After wearing a few automatic watches, I came back to my happy place - digital Casio watch, similar to the one I had as a kid. I think my brain is very used to reading time in that form. I wear ABL100, which is a bit bigger than usual digital Casio and therefore highly wearable.


https://www.olleewatch.com/ is a very interesting project touching Casio watches


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: