@dang nice Unicode hack here you might want to consider filtering

Each architecture has a "library" of these bizarrely named functions that are mapped by the compiler to CPU-specific instructions. I'd suggest 90%+ of C programmers couldn't name a single one of them, and that's fine, because they have no place in C outside of tight platform-specific optimization work, which very few people have a need for or mandate to actually work on

Note this works in both directions, in particular if you're a Yandex user (for example their free mail-for-domains service)

The RFP format automatically excludes the bottom 90% of commodity applicants

That epoch of Google died near on a decade ago now

The presentation of your app is gorgeous, but I was unable to open the try pro free page on LineageOS (no Play Services installed). I was just curious about how monetization worked. It just shows an endless spinner, tried repeatedly and waited 30+ seconds

Just curious, how much time do you think you put into it in total? App / web

Also curious how you marketed it, if at all

Thanks for downloading and reviewing! Yes, you can't buy the pro version without Play Services or the Apple equivalent right now.

I'm monetizing only through subscription. I made it part of my mission to refrain from all ads and focus on privacy as much as possible. For the next version I have removed Firebase Analytics and Crashlytics as well.

The subscription for my app is half as expensive as the one from other apps on the market. But there is a rather hard point where you kinda have to buy PRO. That's if you want to track more than 15 stocks.

I put in around 1000 hours so far.

So, a strike? That was always allowed. Given they’re not supported by the actual unions and are a pretty small fraction of truckers anyway, good luck to them.

Couldn't they theoretically be forced to work with the emergency act? AFAIK it could be argued that they are providing essential services

They need it to maintain growth, otherwise punished ruthlessly by market and lost access to credit. That's not an optional spend

> I'm curious how long these companies can have losses.

Parent didn't ask about access to credit or market capitalization rates, they asked how long they can burn for. If you no longer need credit because you're profitable, then keeping your asset value up is moot.

So yes it very much is an optional spend. I welcome you to listen to a podcast by the CFO of NetSuite:

https://a16z.com/2015/05/15/a16z-podcast-why-saas-revenue-is...

NetSuite's most profitable year was...2009. Yes that 2009. They basically turned off S&M when the economy crashed.

This guy is the financial equivalent of the old world street preacher wearing an "end of the world is nigh" placard. Grantham has been saying the same thing every year for as long as I've had interest in markets. He's considered a joke by the vast majority of the educated financial world

The S&P 500 PE ratio is currently 25.78 while the mean is 15.96. The Fed printed 1/3 of all dollars in circulation in the past 22 months. The velocity of money in the U.S. is at a historical low. How are these facts irrelevant to Grantham's argument?

See https://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-pe-ratio

See also https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BOGMBASE

See also https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V

Grantham has been predicting crashes for 10 years, so I'd say nothing in the last 22 months is relevant to his take.

This just isn't true. He's got a respected name in the financial world, had made huge money over a long career, and has real skin in the game. Bloomberg doesn't give any random person an hour long special segment.

Yes he has called for a drop for a long time and been wrong. When talking about big structural macro themes, it's not that weird to be 10 years early on something and to be wrong for that period.

The game just moves elsewhere. There is always some new hotness with increasingly obscene forward growth expectations. Sell MSFT, buy SNOW. Sell SNOW, buy MDB. Sell MDB, buy PTON. Sell PTON, buy NET etc.