Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | glemmaPaul's commentslogin

Thanks for expanding your comment. But to what you explain here, I think your knowledge and comprehension has only slimmed down a notch. It seems to me that this argument equates thinking to be on the vertical vertices only, but may I say there is a horizontal/broad aspect to it? e.g. You lose grip on what is a good combination of framework/language/standards, you remove the abstraction of multiple layers of external and internal APIs, you leave to study the right software pattern for the job, having the AI comprehend the large chunks for you (thats all loss on thinking). You've lost simple querying and digging through codebase. Gosh, lets even say you lost a bit of git command knowledge. You catch my drift here? I am completely for using AI as a tool to do a lot of the boilerplate work with the right directions. Though remembering some changes in codebase before and letting LLMs do the work, is not the same to me as fully owning up to your system as you know, you actually know. Old man shouting at screen so, to each their own of course! Cheers


Claude has a true attitude of being a poison salesmen that also sells the cure.


Wouldnt GraphQL work as well?


Kool-aid salesmen is selling Kool-aid again


"Ohhhh nice user traction you got there, would be awful if anyone would steal that.."


No I think you should continue, frigging done with gamification of everything, I hope to just learn well


And all this was done in a highly democratic manner, thanks EU!


Did you read the article?

Edit: Based on the downvotes, you obviously didn't. This is a PROPOSAL, not a LAW. It needs to be voted by the EU Parliament (you know, one of the 3 components of democracy as in "separation of powers").


Democracy means that the people decide.

Voting once every 5 years for groups which are organised cross-country, but not letting citizens vote cross-country, and this being the only democratic organ and the one with the least power, with no consequences for any of them breaking election promises, is imho not “letting the people decide”, but “oligarchy with the illusion of choice”


And those politicians there form their own little interest groups across members states and vote accordingly, which is the exact opposite of what we think of democracy.

You'd basically have to rely on magic to know how those politicians you vote in will decide to vote on because they join some sect that lobbies them to vote against your interests.

And we all know no voter aside from the 1% will ever think this far. It's exactly like you called it, the illusion of choice


Anyone that uses Okta should be accepting the fact that they have outsourced a huge chunk of responsibility of their job onto an enterprise company.

These github links are not open source projects, these are public readable software projects. You do not control any of it, you have to deal with internal company politics like "# PRs opened", "# Bugs solved" for the developers' next performance review.


Hey dont tell these neo-technofeuds that their north star example of "success" is anything but souplesse..!!!


Well if open source is one of your USP, then better mention that right? Open Source people tend to also like that their work is.. open source.

And otherwise you 1on1 start competing with notsoOpenAI, or say Llama.


My observation was more on "best", rather than on "fully open". It's like Apple saying "this is the best iPhone" for every new iPhone.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: