Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hapless's commentslogin

Barbituate withdrawal won’t kill you.

Benzodiazepines, and alcohol, can actually induce death if you withdraw too quickly


Barbiturate withdrawal can absolutely kill you, as it is the same process of benzodiazepines and alcohol withdrawals. The other issue is that barbiturates themselves can easily kill you due their MOA, and low therapeutic index


Didn’t Cringely pass away recently?


According to a HN post, and basically nothing else that I can seem to find.

Who knows, maybe he's still alive and posted the death notice himself. Dude is/was a compulsive liar. There's still to this day no actual evidence that he genuinely has passed away (unless I'm just unable to find it)



This post is also dated in July, which would have been before he passed away if that post was accurate.


XKL is still in business (https://xkl.com/)

as far as i know the control plane on their equipment is still a pdp-10 compatible


when the author mentioned playing prince of persia on a pc-xt, i assumed this was some kind of ai-generated nonsense

but no

they actually did port the game to the lowest-end hardware available in 1989. you could actually play prince of persia on an 8088 with a cga card!


Just about every PC game in 1989 ran on an XT with CGA.


The XT came out in 1983, it was a real piece of shit by 1989 standards

Not to mention, the PC was a pretty, uh, "challenging" platform for video games. It amazes me someone managed to port something as graphically sophisticated as PoP to an 8088 with CGA.


PCs were incredibly expensive at the time, though, and barely useful. Most people didn't buy a new one every two years, despite the fast progress in hardware development. So many people, especially kids, were stuck with "ancient" hardware. I had friends who had an 8088 PC or an Apple II in the late 90s.


The XT was significantly more powerful than the Apple II in every way except color depth.


Specifically, no one will earn a promotion by talking to another team or improving customer service


Anxiety is a common comorbidity in depression patients and buprioprion can dramatically raise anxiety levels

It is a second-line treatment for a reason. Great when it works. Harmful when it does not.


Yeah, this is exactly why I couldn’t stay on it. I already deal with GAD and OCD, and whatever benefits it had for the depression were directly counteracted by the return of acute anxiety.

It was truly hellish. Feeling like I had this energy that I needed to use, while also feeling so anxious that I didn’t want to leave the apartment.

I know it works really well for some people but I was definitely not one of them.


Thank you, that answer makes a lot of sense.


Just want to underscore that this is the right answer.


turns out there is more involved in performance than just clock rate

who knew? (everyone)


And the Alpha was faster

The last line of the parent post makes it sound as if the chips didn't exist at the same time.


definitionally that's "for some intents and purposes" my man


For all intents and purposes is a figure of speech, meaning in every practical sense.


It's an important rule if you want the liability protections associated with a limited liability corporation

If you just want to start a business, without any associated shell companies or liability transfers, it costs $0 and requires filing one sheet of paper. It is very easy!

https://www.formulare-bfinv.de/ffw/form/display.do?%24contex...


You're missing the point. There shouldn't be any capital requirement just to get liability protections. No one is forcing counterparties to accept liabilities.


clearly german regulators and/or voters disagree, as is their right

nevertheless it is very easy to start a business, and this man is complaining about an entirely separate problem (it is difficult to create and incorporate two shell companies)


How is that stagnant economy working out for Germans?


"Most people are not autodidacts because most people have no material reason to learn a specific topic (i.e. their job does not require it) and the problem with learning for the sake of learning is opportunity cost: there is no a priori reason to learn one thing over another, so better to do nothing and wait for something to appear which actually grabs your interest. Again, this is likely rational! Could you imagine if you found everything interesting? You’d spend years living in a basement curating a wiki of late Soviet military hardware or something."

uhoh

i've been spotted


We've all been there! Find something looking fun, spend a week on it then never touch again. It's normal human psychology.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: