Full preview of the entire video now available for free with a watermark, so you know exactly what you'll be buying. Users can upgrade to have it removed and gain full commercial rights.
I'm trying to get it infront of potential users yes, but also I didn't know that users needed a 30 second sample generation (just added that) and learned that by posting here on HN.
I loop through all Q&As at the end of the billing period and ask gemini if this users query was solved.
Something fair for customers, thats the goal. But right now my priority is seeing if anyone gives a f** about this to begin with.
Regarding hallucinations: It's not 100% solvable, but can be done pretty well in my opinion with prompting (aka only answer based on facts you see in the documentation)
P.S. if you have docs and want a more "live demo" you can sign up and just put in the docs url and you'll have a live demo without installing the script onto the docs site.
Interesting approach using Gemini for checking whether the answer helped. I wonder how that would work if the response is hallucinated.
As an example: Stripe has sandboxes, I wanted to know how to create them via the CLI but found nothing in the docs. Asked the AI and it was like "Just do stripe sandboxes create <name>".
The command does not exist and the whole functionality is not planned to be added. If another AI now reads this it could interpret it as answered successfully?
Just thinking - but I like the idea of the tool. Would love to use it but currently don't have any public docs to test with. Good luck with your project :)
As an example: Stripe has sandboxes, I wanted to know how to create them via the CLI but found nothing in the docs. Asked the AI and it was like "Just do stripe sandboxes create <name>". The command does not exist and the whole functionality is not planned to be added. If another AI now reads this it could interpret it as answered successfully?
--> I would say so. Not quite sure what Stripe is using on their docs, but sounds like its been given free reign and not grounded in actual docs.
Easiest way is to weed out hallucinations, hasnt been a problem for me at all to be honest.
P.S. For anyone reading, happy to refund all answers that you deem shouldnt be billed.
Just tested the tool on an open source documentation. Looks and feels great but somehow after the initial Preview in the onboarding flow I cannot get the Preview to work. It seems to always answer with the wrong dataset and suddenly says "The provided documents describe Agionic, an Al tool for documentation, and do not contain details about UI component libraries like Grid."
Not sure whats happening here.
Don't push state every time I make a change. It might be the "right" thing to do, but it's annoying that my back-button doesn't work when I've just been fiddling with switches on your page.
Maybe try to get some more prosaic descriptions on the most popular mods? Like: "777, the one you go for after trying everything to make your files readable on windows throught samba, and it still doesn't work"... ;)
