That's like me with violins!

Maybe violins don't write good code after all?

Seems like an AI could be tasked with verifying the docs. Then a human can double check it's work if it finds anything.

Verify against what? What I want verification against lives in the human's head, not the repo.

Oh, I was thinking verify what the doc claims to what the code actually does, I misunderstood you.

https://webstatus.dev/features/anchor-positioning https://webstatus.dev/features/popover

Probably the place to start

Go back a few years "css isn't a real programming language, there are no functions or control flow"

These arrive

"no! NO!"

For a second I didnt see where it says "made by my own two hands", but it's down the bottom.

Phew!

I gather it goes through an intermediate coercion step where it is "1" + "hello".

What trips us up is having existing expectations for what an operator called + should do.

I suspect all branches of tech have their rite of passage.

For haskellers, it is writing a monad tutorial

For javascripters, it is writing a framework

For make-stuff-with-LLM people, it is producing a diagram explaining your code generation factory

... and so on

It would be subversive if the large corporation doing science in space turned out to be benign

Even a stalker would draw the line there.