Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | holoduke's commentslogin

Well. The 5090ti is significantly faster than a 1080ti. It has 92b vs 12b transistors. That's the 10 years difference you mention. 10 years before the 1080ti we had the 8800 ultra with 600m transistors. So yeah you are a bit right. But stacked transistors in the future might become reality and enable transistor increase again.

A 5090 is more than twice as expensive as a 1080 Ti in real MSRP terms and way more than that in actual real terms, since the 1080 Ti was available for some time below MSRP, while the 5090 realistically never was and usually goes for 50-100% above MSRP. So I don't think these can be compared. Basically a similar story with the 5080, it's significantly more expensive in real terms (and about ~2x in nominal terms).

The 5070 Ti would be the same spot.

If you compare these - the RTX 50 card has a bit higher TDP (which it will usually not reach due to clock limits), is a roughly 100mm² smaller die with around 4x the transistors and about 3x the compute (since much more of the chip is disabled compared to the 1080 Ti's chip). It has 5 GB more memory (11->16) and a lot more bandwidth.


Yeah it also lacked driver support. But it was for a very brief moment the king of the hill.

This is what I call AI slop.

The problem with agents is that it is currently way too expensive. 100 times more expensive maybe. Another big issue is the lack of interactivity with an agent. Therefor for now agentic development is only viable from your own machine. And there isolation is less of an issue easier to manage.

People still believing in AI being a temporary thing are the same ones refusing to get a mobile phone in the late 90s. Stating it wasn't needed and just a nice to have.

A key take away from this article is that you as a developer spending as much time on refactoring as on the actual feature. You are constantly requesting code reviews, architectural assessements, consolidations, extractions etc. only then you can empower AI to become a force multiplier. And prevent slop and spaghetti code to be created. Nice article

Why? Who are you supporting instead?

Is there now a requirement for disliking something that I advocate for something else? I just hate Tesla, I am a Tesla hater. That really is it.

I'd love a train network that worked. I've lost too many friends to car.

Supporting? As in, what car do they drive lol

indeed. moltbook vibes

Can't we just use claude desktop / cli to generate an invoice. In my experience if you provide some skills and access to some data it can generate pretty consistent invoices. No other tools needed at all.

Invoices have strict requirements and having the model accidentally hallucinate and make an incorrect invoice could put you in legal trouble. Besides, why would you pay for tokens instead of using a free tool?

Why would you knowingly generate invoices that are sometimes wrong? That’s probably illegal and certainly going to be a pain in the ass. Why make a critical business function dependent of the availability of an external service when you could easily do it locally?

My clients love non-deterministic invoices.

But if they use "AI" to approve them, you can pray that your "AI" generates an invoice for 100x the amount owed and their "AI" pays!

My Claude can create a reuse a 200% deterministic script that generates invoices tailored exactly to my needs. No way any other tool can match that. You guys live in ancient times

lol, exactly xd

I thought the impact of Thea made heavier elements spread much more evenly towards the surface.

True, but even with that, the amount of siderophile elements like platinum and gold in the crust is much less than in the core of the Earth ("siderophile" means that at the contact between molten iron and molten silicate rock such elements go into the molten iron).

Without that impact, it is assumed that almost no platinum-group metals and gold would have remained in the crust.


> Without that impact, it is assumed that almost no platinum-group metals and gold would have remained in the crust.

Wow, its wild to think of a counterfactual world without gold. Would those metals have emerged to the crust from volcanism or is that material not sourced deeply enough?


Volcanism at most brings material from the upper mantle, but usually such material becomes mixed with material from the crust, while ascending.

The mantle has slightly bigger concentrations of precious metals than the crust, but the concentrations remain many times smaller than in the core.

The reason is that both the mantle and the crust are made mostly of silicate rocks. The mantle is made of heavy silicate rocks and the crust is made of light silicate rocks, which float on the denser mantle.

The metals that are resistant to oxidation do not mix well with silicates, so they tend to segregate from them, and then, being heavier than rocks, they tend to descend towards the core. If they reach the core, then they dissolve into the melted iron.

When lava is expelled by volcanism, the precious metals contained in it usually separate from the silicates together with metal sulfides and arsenides, which makes them easier to find than if they were dispersed uniformly in the rocks. Other elements that ere much more abundant, for instance germanium and gallium, are harder to mine than the precious metals because they are not concentrated in distinct minerals but they are uniformly distributed in many rocks.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: