Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | iamgopal's commentslogin

If Apple forces developers to support Shortcuts, ensures true Mac-to-iPhone parity, and lets users generate scripts using natural language AI, it’s game over. Nailing this native integration would single-handedly kill the market for almost every derivative AI app out there.

Siri-generated Shortcuts would be so good if they were good.

Generative AI is created by human worth.

Human wealth? Humans, some, are worth more than others, per birth rates and varying investments by institutions.

No, it's created by data scanned from the internet, books and fed to the models. How is that a good thing for anyone? I'd love your take. People spend years giving themselves value to others to live a life of worth and value.

The data just scanned itself and organized itself into an neural network? Would be an awesome display of bootstrapped intelligence if that happened! Sadly, it was the result of decades of human research.

Decades of human research and mountains of work used without permission. Not that they legally did or didn't need that permission, but ethically, kind of a dick move.

Yep, that's the sad part.

Is hallucinations and deep thinking tangential optimization steps ?

AutoDesk is next ?



They already have a CAD thing, so I think that’s a safe bet.


The one thing that we should look at given recent advance in maths using lean is, computer science will ( and should be ) used to create appropriate language for other fields ( biology, process, chemistry, games, movies etc ). ( hammer / nail analogy ). Science <-> Engineering used to be about representing anything in math so as to define and solve it, now onwards it will be about representing it in a language.


Just ~250000 years ( in atmospheric absorption rate )


Weird thing to say to a comment that explicitly says this is about warming the oceans. The original calculation, assuming all the energy is dumped directly into the ocean would be: 87B / (60*60*24*365*4) = 689.69 years.

Funny thing about the atmosphere though is that it requires ~1300x less energy to heat up by 1 degree, so if you dump all that energy into the atmosphere, the temperature would go up by ~2 degrees per year.

The reality is that global warming warms up both the oceans and the atmosphere to varying degrees (and the earth's crust, to much lesser degree), with the ocean absorbing most of that. The atmosphere only absorbs about 23% of that, and a significant amount of the of the excesses radiate back into space.

But even with a conservative estimate that only 1% of this heat is being stored in the atmosphere, that would still lead to a global atmospheric temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius every 50 years. The worst-case scenarios estimate 2% of this heat is retained, dropping that down to 25 years.

I'm going to go ahead and guess that waiting 2.5M years isn't the answer. That's geological time scales anyway, Humans could have gone extinct and been replaced with new intelligent life in that kind of time. Whatever math you did to reach that figure, it's completely wrong.


How far are we from optical computing ?


Kubernetes but for agent ?


why golang lost to rust ?


Either would have worked, but rust's fussy compiler & memory features is an advantage for LLMs. The more bug catching you can shift out of runtime and into compile time the better since the LLM can fix it


go is even more straightforward for llms imo. It's a dead simple language with a good garbage collector, where you can still do a lot memory management


Simplicity is a feature too.

> you can still do a lot memory management

That’s kinda my point - you don’t really want to trust the LLM to get any sort of memory management right. A system where hard constraints are baked into the language itself and the LLM fights the compiler at compile time removes a lot of hoping the LLM got it right.

Ultimately either works though so use whatever you enjoy


I wouldn't say it has lost. Big firms like Microsoft and Amazon are just afraid to use Go since it's by Google, a known evil firm. This doesn't hold back smaller firms that need to move fast.


> The software engine underpinning GitHub Copilot and a growing number of Microsoft products

I’m guessing so it can interop easier with C/C++ codebases? Just a stab in the dark, I have no idea.


If I understand correctly, it can play chess and rubic cube better than LLM ? ( may be go too ? )


I was wondering the same! So I asked Astra to build me https://jev-chess-master.vercel.app/ where you play against Jev AI as chess player.

You play White, and Jev plays Black. Rather than asking an LLM to generate move strings or JSON, the backend feeds all server-validated legal candidate moves into Vercel AI SDK's experimental_evaluate(). Jev picks Black's move and outputs its probability distribution across all legal candidates in a single forward pass (~300ms, ~$0.00004/move).

Github link: https://github.com/qibinlou/jev-chess

Hope this helps!


ok I've searched, it may not, but it can do "driving car" and "trade 0-DTE Option" much better.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: