"Two-phase immersion cooling is not dead. ZutaCore and Chemours are both pushing toward PFAS-free solutions that could revive the segment. But the timeline for commercial-scale availability of those alternatives stretches through 2026 and into 2027. The EU regulatory decision could land before the alternative fluids do. And the hyperscalers who were the most likely buyers at scale have already moved on."
Feels analogous to looking for cold fusion because of the downsides of fission.
I didn't get a significant sense of loss from this article though. Especially given the downsides of PFAS.
It took me about a second to realize the link took you to a list of articles. It took another second to realize the article referenced was second in the list.
Manufacturers know people do this. The TV will attempt to connect to any open network (neighbors) and I'd be shocked if they haven't at least considered packaging them with 4G/5G antennas. You're gonna need a Faraday Cage.
If you try to render tables with millions of cells the browser does a really poor job and the performance is abysmal. The only solution when you need to render that many cells is to virtualize the table and only have the visible cells (plus some buffer) actually in the DOM at a time. That plus weird restrictions browsers put on certain table elements (looking at you thead) that prevent them from being "sticky" headers means that the developer is left with absolutely positioned divs as the only solution. Blame browser vendors for not providing a native way to present tabular data with more than a few hundred thousand rows without causing performance issues.
there's table-layout:fixed that makes rendering of large tables much faster.
I'd argue that if you have so many rows that DOM can't handle, humans won't either. Then you need search, filtering, data exports, not JS attaching a faked scrollbar to millions of rows.
The term "range" (in the context of a "home") typically describes a multi-function cooking appliance that features a rangetop for heating pots and an oven directly beneath it. Why is this page about lightbulbs? The subtitle even has the word they should've used instead of "range": "products".
To be fair, I think most usage is of the form "range of ____". Even the definitions provided illustrate this with "range of options", "range of opinions", "range of model railway accessories". The exception is "This jacket is part of our autumn/spring range", which is a formulation that I've personally never heard; I would generally expect "autumn/spring line".
