Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | imightbebatman's commentslogin

You've probably noticed, people like this like to adjust the goalposts.


That won't solve anything. Congress already has this power they just abdicated it to the Executive. The only fix is better voters electing better people into Congress. -- good luck with both of those. The US is cooked.


No, it’s not good enough, you need a better system. Like in Switzerland


The Los Angeles metropolitan area has more people that Switzerland.

Population aside, there's no system that fixes what's broken in the US in the 21st century.

Trump, sadly, is the symptom of deeper structural ills that have been building in America for decades.


Congress moves a lot slower, though. Congress isn't going to change tariffs every 24 hours. It takes a lot longer to get anything through Congress.

I mean, you still have the "every 4 years", or worse, "every few months". It's not at the pace that Trump changes things, though.


There is absolutely 0 reason for tariffs to need to change every 24 hours. It is economically suicidal to do so. In fact.


That's not going to happen. These people are not competent.


Yeah, but I want the suckers who still defend them to put up or shut up.


Yes there are two interesting derivative questions from this, assuming I understand it.

First, is it reproducible consistently at ~50% of workers? If not, what is the rate.

Second, are there any lessons to be learned here to increase the rate of success by changing models/weights/training?

The news by itself isn't really good news. But it could lead to good news. Maybe.


In my experience with them, Trump voters have no shame.

We should bring honor and Shane back into our culture.


Noone with sense has ever accused Trump of being smart when it comes to geopolitics or war.


Or anything else tbf


In my opinion this is worth revolting about.

It is critically important to the future of your progeny, that 1-2 companies are not able to corner the AI landscape.

Open-source and open-weight or we throw ourselves on the machine worthy.


If there ever truly were consequences in the oligarchy of the US, the time for that is long gone now. There will be none.


Somewhat might be the understatement of the century.


I have a similar PoV. I think rent seeking without sufficient checks is one of the biggest problems in our economy.

But the underlying problem that people aren't paid enough is still true. Outside a few fields, most people are underpaid. It's even more stark when measured against productivity increases during the same time periods. That wealth went somewhere. It wasn't to most people.

People have a tendency to get upset when they realize these kinds of things.


Restaurant operations is one of the places where it's most clear the rent is the biggest problem.

You can say restaurant workers need to be paid more, and ok sure, but where is that money coming from? You pay labor, food suppliers, rent, utilities, taxes, and... where exactly is the money to pay workers more coming from?

With the number of empty storefronts in my city (not to mention restaurant closures) it's clear owners aren't making money hand over fist or there would be many more restaurants.

Restaurant workers in my experience are more likely to go to more restaurants and they can't because... their rent is too high and the price of food at restaurants is too high.

The common denominator with all of it is money being sucked away from people doing work and people hiring work by... rent seekers.

The "labor share of income" is exactly this. How much money is getting sucked out of the rest of the economy to prop up the do-nothing class. Retired people whose retirement investment was selling a house for much more labor than they bought it for and real estate owners doing as little as they can to maximize income they aren't earning.


From outside it doesn't look like not being paid enough. It looks like affordability problem. Prices in general are too high.

Rents in general are part of this. Both for housing and commercial property. Somehow getting profit from both rent and appreciation is the goal of the system.

Well that is what population voted for and choose not to overthrow system for so maybe they deserve it.


Underlying rent are other things going up - property taxes, input costs like labor and materials, and insurance.

While we must be mindful of greed and abuse, we need to include all underlying costs before just assuming people are cranking up rents. I'm not a landlord but I own property and the costs are gotten vicious lately. Labor is expensive, materials are insane, energy costs, and now insurance are suffocating. And in states with high property taxes, watch out.


Energy is one variable. But have things gotten less efficient as things keep going up in prices? Is more labour needed to produce the same? There is stuff like regulation forcing more expensive things. But in general if there was efficiency gains things should keep the same price or drop. Somehow this isn't really happening very well.

But my thesis really is that these things are not underlying the rents. But rents are actually underlying these costs. And well in general the rent seeking economic process build on ever growing valuations of everything.


Your theory is just that - theory. Just talk to someone who owns property, or do the research. Insurance costs, Up, energy, Up, when something breaks, it costs more to fix it. It's basic input cost math.

I don't know what 'efficiency gains' means here. Maybe you're thinking of car production or software development. Insurance goes up due to climate change, due to insurance companies taking advantage of a poorly regulated environment, whatever other reasons. Energy goes up due to world events, due to more people, due to extreme weather. Labor costs go up due to inflation.

It feels as thought the 'rent is too damn high' crowd needs an enemy, and the enemy is landlord. And again, not a landlord, but I'm getting bitten by high costs of keeping property. I didn't even talk about the property taxes.

If I WERE a landlord, I'd either pass it along to the tenant as higher rent, or I'd sell the damn thing.


Times are getting worse and the landlord class is an unnecessary middleman.

And again, the headline is the labor share of income is at an 80-ish year low. The landlord class grew too big. We want many of them to be forced out of the business either by law or by economic loss forcing sale.

A home is a fundamental human right. Maintaining rental profits in the face of economic hardship is not.


You're repeating talking points that seem ideological in a response to a direct, falsifiable set of assertions. That's the most terrifying thing about ideologies, whether right or left - they just don't pay attention to debate or facts, but stamp repeated assertions religiously.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: