Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | irickt's commentslogin

Seems to me that they are simple saying its not important:

"At 50 years, it’s only natural to look back. But Apple has always looked forward, building tools and delivering experiences that enrich people’s lives. As we celebrate how far we’ve come, we’re inspired by where we’ll go — together."

And, no, I don't think they left it to chance.

Also there's an art video to go with the art animation.


The article is mostly a rant about Deno not making a public statement about layoffs. This links to the individual statements about leaving: https://www.reddit.com/r/Deno/comments/1rwjaeb/whats_going_o...

HN as huge RLHF data source for our behavior refinement . Yum!

(Reinforcement learning from human feedback)


SDLC ? software development life cycle ?


Yeah, software development life cycle.


We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as yet we have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it should exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors—in moral terms: the obligation to lie according to a fixed convention, to lie herd-like in a style obligatory for all. Now man of course forgets that this is the way things stand for him. Thus he lies in the manner indicated, unconsciously and in accordance with habits which are centuries' old; and precisely by means of this unconsciousness and forgetfulness he arrives at his sense of truth.

Nietzsche.

On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense https://web.archive.org/web/20180625190456/http://oregonstat...


Truth is just a tool that helps you make good predictions. It's increasingly clear that this is all intelligence amounts to: a constant cycle of prediction and error correction with the goal of maximizing reproductive fitness in humans or minimizing a loss function in machines.

One serious problem we're facing lately is that truth is not always predictive of how systems controlled by bad-faith actors will behave and evolve. We live in a post-truth era, made possible by social networking and information technologies in general. It's not enough to "lie according to a fixed convention," as there are now multiple competing conventions.

This was always the case to some extent, but these days the impedance mismatch between truth and consequences is a target for zero-sum arbitrage. The truth won't set you free if you join the wrong cult; it's more likely to bankrupt you or worse.


We are so deep in the Simulacrum regarding the complexity of our systems we could be well past the point where extinction is inevitable before we even notice it's a possibility.


A more explanatory article mentioned in the post: https://evincarofautumn.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-concatenati...


ah, thanks, that's why my first thought was that "hey, this feels very FORTH like"


the link is 404


fixed, thanks!


I think not "ideally" in any case. Rather "practically" could be banned, for what badness?

It doesn't claim it was authored by humans. It is clearly the work product of human who transparently is using AI.

The work product if it works as claimed is rather amazing. Maybe even an inflection in AI use, if it would be sustainable.


Read more carefully, critics. He's sharing a big ol' mixed metaphor for living. The world and your mind are vast. Your job is to narrow it down to exactly your life. You are your own author.


What do the columns represent?


Do you mean the column artifacts in the 3d rendering? It is rendering incorrect on my aging iPad.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: