It's _almost_ the same length if you count the period on "N/A." but not on "None."

claude can pretty easily generate pdfs and give those to the user to download, skipping the step of needing a source first.

That's a worse workflow imo than having a source w/ version history, but I don't think it's uncommon.

what do you mean by losing terminal real estate?

If you mean the navbar/where it shows the tabs/windows/whatever, doesn't ghostty also have a tab bar?

With screen/tmux (and I assume zellij), you can hide the tab bar completely if you want.

For anyone else confused like I was, Florian is who wrote the article

I'd like to see a consumer version too, I don't need a whole rack of them. I probably can't even afford one gpu-sized one

I assume it's talking about syncing/migrating from github -> origin? And not that github is hte actual upstream of origin? That would be great though

Indeed. I have several domains using cf for dns only and they don't/can't inject anything into those sites.

"can't" is incorrect. As your name server, they can decide to turn the reverse proxy/caching at any point in the future, write an obscure blog post about how this is the best solution for all (a post that gets 2 comments on HN due to other news that week), and you'd only find out about it 11 months later in a thread like this one.

what does signing up get you? Since it seemed to work without an account and OPs workaround?

don't forget:

6. let llm write a blog post about this conversation

My assumption is that people who want multi-user code editors are the same people who are forced to work in a place that requires heavy pair programming.

I could see it being useful if you're helping someone debug something, but chances are it's easier just to screenshare.