Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | l-l's commentslogin

Funny and miserable at the same time, frankly.


we are levelling up with this.


Ideally a minimalistic version of Notion which is less centered on teamwork and less stuffed organizationally speaking. However, I wouldn't personally mind expanding options and tools for textual editing, preferably with extension into more HTML-friendly interface and functionality, or even actual programming syntax support (think Obsidian, for example).


at last a single delightful submission without links.


thanks to you i don't have to question WSJ's paywall once again, this time here.


I ALWAYS link to paywall bypasses for WSJ/Washington Post/New York Times


yeah, as i said, thank you again.

any other periodicals coming up, maybe?


"uncencored"

"non-woke"


Sorry, what seems to be the issue?

I know it might sound a bit cheesy, but I believe it's uncensored enough to call it that. Try asking DALL·E to create an image of world politicians crashing planes into buildings (not sure why anyone would want that).

My decision to promote the uncensored nature of Flux was based on the fact that it's gaining traction on X and Reddit, where the user base often has specific political leanings.

Anything I should improve? :)


Spelling in the title, and pointlessly inflamatory language.


Thank you!

I feel really silly for asking, but could you clarify which spelling mistake you're referring to? (I'm not denying there might be one.) Neither ChatGPT nor I could find one.

Regarding the language I chose, I completely understand your point, and it might be worth exploring other alternatives. However, I currently have 250 active visitors (who joined within the last 30 minutes), and it seems like the formulation might be going over their heads.

Initially, I was planning on releasing it without any text at all, with just one input.


uncencored

should be spelled

uncensored

in the title of your post.


Oh, got it!

I thought you meant on the website...

Still unprofessional.


nah, now i think about it after another comment here, it might really be an unnecessary nitpicking of mine. shit happens here and there, and it's not every time in our power to catch the errors.

still, the thing about twitter/reddit userbase is kinda baffling, i.e. are they even a solid reason for including a remark on 'wokeism', just because of the respective communities' fuss? IMO still better to tie this one to your service's uncensored-ness, in whatever sense of noncommittal to "mainstream liberal media's" consensus or whatnot you choose (if only you still insist on using political slang at all, of course, which i personally suggest to be dropped for any area of the left-right axis or planar compass, while we're speaking about a non-targeted and universal image creation platform.)


In my 30 years of Internet, I got used to read over misspellings and typos. I still can understand it.

Just finished reading:

https://www.pressermag.com/september-2024/the-left-has-an-au... (it's here on HN)

And thinking now.. are people who dictate others to obey to proper writing are they authoritarian? Not in the sense of authority, but in the sense of follower and obeyer? :)

Correction suggested:

Non-woke -> sleepy


First of all, you don't deserve a hypothetical "good" founder badge just because of striving to direct your business into either of the mainstream venues, and not something less overhyped or explored.

Thus, secondly, nobody can outright disregard your whole enterprise based solely on the latter being too "original" or unapologetically centered around the issues you care about the most yourself, instead of those everyone else seems to be buzzing about.

Hence, thirdly, who they are to judge your success being likelier in an area you're clearly less interested in but apparently getting more attention from around the globe, despite your possible higher readiness to put more effort into a problem which visibly less folks dare to delve into?


can we talk about WSJ's paywall now



oh

wow

okay


Worse than some, better than others.


also noticed that on some websites being typed in and hit enter afterwards (no matter if they're functionable at all or not), your interface goes plain blank for some reason (i suppose for the sites that are up but run through "HTTP" instead of "HTTPS" or vice versa, it might just happen when you type the mismatching protocol name into the search field, though it barely sheds any light on possible ways of troubleshooting the issue itself).


btw i strongly suggest working further on image analysis so the algorithm takes not only textual elements as an input but visual ones as well.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: