Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lanewinfield's commentslogin

I've been thinking a lot about this across many different mediums, not just filmmaking, and I think it's one worth digging deeper on.*

What is lost when losing the (understandably annoying) process of the grind? By letting LLMs do the busy work, do you lose the opportunity to stumble into randomness? Do you lose the understanding of what is possible/interesting with the medium?

And do you end up in this derivative future where decisions are made by a system that was trained on all the previous uses of it?

Obviously that's fairly hyperbolic, but I have absolutely felt the pull of it all. When it decides to take a couple extra steps I didn't ask for creatively and I think "eh, that's fine."

*EDIT: I wrote this and looked back and this SOUNDS like an LLM wrote it. See what I mean??????


GPT-404

Darn it, model probably escaped again

Has yet to catch up to Claude-451 from a couple of months ago.

They’ll never get there. It’s a chat-22 for the bots.

I expected this to call out the number of links that are obviously vibe coded, like itself!

If you see:

- ALL CAPS subheaders

- a light beige background

- burnt sienna anchor and/or highlight text

- a "• LIVE" (or really any pulsing • symbol with an ALL CAPS follow-up)

- tons of variation in font sizes (this one has 15 different text sizes!)

- more typically, a lot of overexplaining

...you know it's vibe'd, specifically with Claude!


you mean the first or the thirteenth.


I see what you did there


Hilariously this is successfully tracking these cameras being overloaded with requests in real time.


Perhaps there needs to be a plugin for these tools that uses your webcam to make you Point and Call (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointing_and_calling) for every single approval.


Recently I was trying to fix something in the production database, and had called over a co-worker as sanity-check.

I ended up telling them about point-and-call because I felt a little silly, pointing to everything on the screen and stating what I believed it said and how that would operate once I pressed the big red button.


I’d give it 2 months for it to turn into a “please drink verification can to continue”-type situation.


100%. I had one in my cart before I uncovered this stuff. Obviously people have a right to speak (and to buy the product), but it's too far for me.


Cost per kill ("CPK" in industry lingo) is a dark phrase that feels disturbingly within reach of some of these companies.



Yeah it's sort of alarming when you think about hooking up models to take action in the real world and telling them it's just a game. Several scifi stories have it as a plot twist that humans think they are playing a game but are killing actual people. I'm not sure if the same twist shows up for AIs but it seems like an increasingly real possibility.


You’re anthropomorphising.

Actual AI is like the Terminator. There’s no human feeling, it will do what it’s designed to do. No emotion, no remorse.

Cue the swarming drones… :/


the target just may be on the scale of kills per cost.


https://50centadjustedforinflation.com/

50 Cent is up 1 cent to 113 Cent.


Thank you for sharing your story! I wish you continued success and I also hope that one day someone will share with you about how YOUR story helped them do something similar, just like the article did for you.

Also, Preston Thorpe (who Gavin mentions as inspiration) has an interesting story as well: https://pthorpe92.dev/intro/my-story/


Also recommend folks check out Unlocked Labs, who run a prison program for this sort of thing. Jessica is an angel:

https://unlockedlabs.org/


Thank you for the link, and for sharing your story.


Thank you for that link. I recommend reading to the very last line.


How nice is that!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: