finally, no more lsof grep! :))

you don't need subscription model, just one price for lifetime - that will be fair and convert better.

don't do trials - do refund within 28 days

> don't do trials - do refund within 28 days

iOS does not allow developers to refund their customers since no personal information is shared with the developer

nice. where do you fetch locations from?

how do you detect bot traffic?

can it be used to read precisely as well and export data as JSON?

yes

looks beautiful. could I just build this using my tokens?

Thanks! From what I've seen, LLMs confidently generate SwiftUI that looks off from what you want on the first try, then you're spending a couple of rounds getting it to fix it. I am just making it easier. These are all real, compiled, and Simulator-rendered, so you start from something that actually builds. The MCP just hands them to your agent so it composes from working components instead of guessing.

Also, this is community based, if you have some awesome components and would be happy to share. Please do so. Thanks

basically a reminder app?

The service is partially a reminder app but actually does the work for you.

I love books and I love this one.

How are you going to add more places/books? anything automated?

the phrase "reverse" confused me (i see somebody pointed out the same)

how many dau you have?

is it retail or hype driven - that's the question

Seems to be working out better than leaving it up to the market

Why does the US stock market keep having record years while the population doesn't seem to benefit, whereas the opposite is happening in China? Isn't that a failure of US capitalism?

The population in china is falling off a cliff....low birth rates, collapsing property prices (the main vehicle for personal investment), slowing ecconomy.

China's population has dropped a few million over the last 5 years, but over the last 20 years they have still gained 100 million people.

So they should have kept pumping property prices until the bubble popped at 3x the size? 5x? 10x?

If China's internal politics was like US internal politics, they would have done exactly that, and it would have been the wrong thing to do.

What do you mean why?

This memory stock popping on IPO has nothing to do with how well/bad capitalism provides in the USA. This is entirely about Chinese investors speculating on this company's ability to grow and undercut some Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron. Nobody knows on IPO day if a company will grow into the expectations of the investors.

And China's population mostly invested in Evergrande real estate, not stocks. Lots of workers in the US are at least invested in the stock market via their 401k/IRA, but the same isn't true of Chinese workers.

Also worth reiterating that most US stocks aren't doing great. The top 10 by market cap keep dragging the indexes into growth, but success is heavily biased towards the monster caps.

In the US, shareholders get rich while regular people get left behind. In China, shareholders returns seem quite bad, and standards of living seem to actually improve. Granted, China started from a much lower point, which makes rapid growth a lot easier.

Is the latter part actually true in this decade or just "face"?

It's not a failure, that's just how capitalism works.

You're supposed to redistribute the money to the poor. That's what FDR did and was later copied by European socialists.

If the poor were worth having money, the market would distribute money to them (Obligatory /s specifically for the HN audience).

That sounds like government intervention to me.

imo, every form of country order has a tipping point from where it starts deteriorating at record speed - cannot tell exactly what comes after ultimate capitalism but I think it's hitting peak points

Except the CCP seems perfectly fine with with allowing (semi) private companies to compete and innovate freely and it has worked out quite well for them..