Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | loaph's commentslogin

It’s not a recent thing. Search for 1872 here, https://www.purduegloballawschool.edu/blog/news/california-n...

Some form of a ban on noncompete enforcement in CA has existed since then.

It has long been codified in CA business code 16600, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...


I've used https://pairdrop.net/ before to share files between devices on the same LAN. It obviously wouldn't have to be a website, but it's pretty convenient since all my devices I wanted to share files on already have a browser.


Same use case, but I remember getting approval prompts ( though come to think of it, those were not mandated, but application specific prompts to ensure you consciously choose to share/receive items ). To your point, there are valid use cases for it, but some tightening would likely be beneficial.


I suspect they're saying ISPs doing it would be begging for censorship, not that your project is


Yep, small step to one of those being enabled by default


> If you're pulling in a package that has 400 dependencies, how the heck would you even competently check 10% of that surface area?

At my place of work we use this great security too called Snyk. Definitely check it out

/s


I think it does sounds really bad. After one year, 26 years lifespan. We get that by doing:

30 - (30.1 - 1) = 26.

Doing that again for the next year: 26 - (26.1 - 1) = 22.4.

So you now have 22.4 years of life vs an expected 28.

etc...


If the math is correct, you'd have an expected life of ~10.2 years. (30*(0.9)^n - n) = 0.

That said, when someone says "it reduces the lifespan by 10%", I'm a bit skeptical of the math. Either they are not properly testing it, or the temperatures are exceeding silicon parameters.


Do you have a source? My experience is the opposite is often true


It's called Cyberpunk 2077


Good news! It's coming to Apple Silicon next year...

https://www.cyberpunk.net/en/news/50947/just-announced-cyber...


I interpreted this along the lines of it not being a pigment, rather it's black because something about it's physical structure at a small scale causes light to not reflect back. Adding a thin coating of gold would not necessarily change that structure so it would continue not reflecting light.

^ pure conjecture


I believe it's something called "structural absorption", similar to what happens on birds of paradise feathers [1]

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02088-w


I wonder if this pattern is considered similar to fractals? Or would that work even better? I recently learned that we have figured out how to produce fractal light from lasers as well which sounds quite interesting and useful.

Maybe the reason radio waves travel poorly through trees is due to the leaves having a fractal-like structure as well? And since light is also just electromagnetic radiation too, it makes sense that this phenomenon could also be used to absorb light itself, if I'm understanding correctly. I wonder if this is how stealth paint on aircraft works?


I'm way out of my depth here, but I think this comparison to the birds of paradise feathers makes the most sense in terms of me visualising what Nxylon would look like with a thin metallic coating


> Adding a thin coating of gold would not necessarily change that structure

My confusion is that I would normally expect a layer of gold not to permit any light to pass through. The underlying structure wouldn't be receiving any light, so there would be no photons to trap. Apparently a layer of gold can be applied thinly enough to transmit appreciable light, though.


Gold foil can be beaten to under 2 micrometers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_leaf


This part of the article confused me, because what does a black pigment do if not "inherently prevent light from escaping"? That's kind of just the definition of absorb.


Just from the title it sounded like this was unusual. From reading the article it is not. It doesn't mean the next cycle is starting sooner than expected


So it's multi threaded.


Hah, yeah that sounds like a good analogy


is that because of how the sun twists as it rotates?


From Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin who filed the lawsuit:

> Once installed, Temu can recompile itself and change properties, including overriding the data privacy settings users believe they have in place.

Pretty scary/shocking if this is true

Also from the lawsuit:

>App store security scans don't flag Temu's risks, the complaint alleged, because Temu can "change its own code once it has been downloaded to a user’s phone"—which means it's essentially able to transform into malware once it is past the security checkpoint.

I really want to know if the above is actually possible? I would assume this would break code signing


It sounds implausible that the app can bypass OS-level restrictions. According to the Ars article this is the original source of the allegations:

https://grizzlyreports.com/we-believe-pdd-is-a-dying-fraudul...

Reading that report more closely, it appears that the app has many characteristics the analysts considered suspicious but there's no evidence that it can actually bypass OS-level restrictions. The report is from September 2023 so if there were actually Android bugs that allowed permissions bypass I would have expected more security reporting from Google or third parties by now.


I'm with you on that part. It's not clear to me exactly how this is happening that doesn't cause other issues.


What about more clickbait?

> Because of the many twists, the universe could contain copies of itself that might look different from the original, making them less easy to spot in maps of the cosmic microwave background.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: