Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mbarbar's commentslogin

Could I ask what kind of work you do day to day? Does it feel sluggish in comparison to Linux for that use case?


Mostly sys-admin stuff, a lot of terminals, ssh, config editing, minor programing. but I keep a few desktop utilities (gimp, inkscape, blender) for when I want to make pictures, notably absent is a file manager, the shell takes care of all my file manipulation needs. but if I had to recommend one it would be xfe.

Speed-wise I think is is more sluggish than a linux system. I like and keep it because openbsd is so comfortable. openbsd was the first operating system where I felt I understood it and it's motivations. every once in a while I try to replicate my preferred system on linux(void linux comes close to what I like about openbsd) but usually find myself back on openbsd(usually with a sigh of relief) in a couple of weeks.


>Yes, but there's also a reason why the Rust -> JS route never took off.

What is this reason?


>CakeML is also a very cool project in SML land.

I've been very interested in CakeML lately, do you use it for anything?


What kinds of improvements does Helix offer over Kakoune?


For me it was that it worked mostly just like Kakoune (or at least, the parts i used of Kakoune) with nicely integrated LSP. It also had TreeSitter based movement options and themes, which is really interesting too. A potential future where vim-like navigation is done on TreeSitter objects is attractive.

The potential DSP integration is nice too. And to top it all off, it's made in a language i enjoy and within the first 24h of using it i had a PR made for a small feature i wanted. Being able to contribute in a language i enjoy was nice.


I don't use either one, but just from reading the comments here: using treesitter for syntax highlighting and having LSP configured out of the box (for kakoune I think you need to install an extension called kak-lsp).


It appears to me those are the types the functions expect to consume and output when used in a pipeline.


>And if simple humanpower really was the reason IBM took shortcuts

Is this referring to the closed blobs on Power10? Is there anywhere to read more?

And is there any indication Power11 won't suffer the same? Someday POWER9 won't cut it for performance...


The blobs on POWER10 as I remember were firmware for the memory sticks themselves since it used OMI to talk to the DIMMs, and IBM had to get third party OMI<->DDRX controllers. I see why they could have reason to believe that situation could change.


This has been echoing around the internet the past few days, but all the echoes lead back to this one comment:

https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/phoronix/latest-phoron...

So really it's just one guy on phoronix who made that claim. Probably just wishful thinking. But if it is true, everybody with first-hand knowledge of it would be under NDA. So we'll probably never know.


How are you finding the battery? It seems this is the most common complaint.

Edit: and also, what's the software support story here?



More than accents are non-Latin scripts.


Wonder what frontier we'll look back on in the same way in 50 years.


Yeah, I was wondering the same, I know for sure it's not the industry I'm in, which is now "mature" and boring. It's probably something we're not even familiar with because it's so niche. Or maybe it is something that we know, but to our eyes it doesn't seem that powerful. In the same way that people used to think of computers as just tools for doing multiplications and other arithmetic operations and they could have never imagined everything else that computers do.


I work on static analysis (points-to analysis) that does not use any GPU at all and is mostly single threaded.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: