I definitely found the thesis insightful. The actual content stopped feeling insightful to me in the “What uv drops” section, where cut features were all listed as if they had equal weight, all in the same breathless LLM style

I would be able to absorb your perspective better if it were structured as a bulleted list, with SUMMARY STRINGS IN BOLD for each bullet. And if you had used the word "Crucially" at least once.

Deepfakes require zero work now

It seems like 99% of apartment listings in the city of New York are virtually staged with AR furniture

It’s explicitly not testing if you can synthesize insulin in a crisis, it’s a general aptitude test for “if we tell you you need to cram this textbook on how to synthesize insulin by next week and then ask you how to do it on a call, can you coherently repeat that back to us?”

I don’t see the value in condescending here. I think the person you’re responding to highlighted an interesting question/point of confusion of whether digital exhibits are on average more or less expensive than physical exhibits in both the short and long term.

Yep I own a rocking chair that my great great grandfather built on a lathe and a dining table my grandfather built. Meanwhile I’ve eventually had to replace almost everything I’ve bought from IKEA.

In some cases that "eventually" has been before putting the damned thing together because the low quality particle board they use can't even survive shipping.

Not OP but one is kind of interesting. It’s the “I said yes” posts with picture of engagement ring that are a 0 to me

This was a fun prompt. I learned things from the models. Gemini 2.5 was wayy better than gpt5 here even though quite incomplete in the first response

They all got $1.5 million today so I’m not too worried about the poor workers.

Yeah this is kind of a stunning amount of information to provide but also basically like polished bullet points

Must feel that way because that’s probably exactly what it is