> If it is then I have a 5th amendment right not to.
No, you don't. You have a 5th amendment right not to incriminate yourself. That means:
1. You must have committed a crime, which is not a given in a traffic accident.
2. You may not be coerced by the government into incriminating yourself. You are not protected from your property incriminating you. Imagine how absurd a world that would be: the government couldn't use a bloody knife as evidence of a knife attack because the knife was owned by the attacker.
Importantly, you'll also note that if you try not to provide evidence against yourself in civil discovery, you'll end up in a world of shit involving contempt of court.
I think where I take issue is the fact that I believe I should have control and ownership of the data from my vehicle and that such data should be protected by the fifth amendment. The government obviously should be able to look at the car itself or the bloody knife.
> Taking something without paying for it is theft.
You keep using the word "theft". Let's grab the definition of "theft" from a legal dictionary:
> Theft is the taking of another person's personal property with the intent of depriving that person of the use of their property. Also referred to as larceny.
The intent of depriving another of their property is a key element of theft. When one receives a copy of data, no one is deprived of their property. It's substantially similar to how I can not steal your car by taking a photo of it.
Not only that, but the typical intellectual property industry nonsense of referring to unauthorized copying as "theft" does not apply. Google, who have acquired a right to distribute this data, are serving it to you.
> You can get into whatever legalize [sic] you want but that doesn’t change the fact that you are doing what the vast majority of people recognize as the common definition of theft.
The legalese matters because it's the best way we've come up with to consistently reason about topics like this regardless of shared values.
There is no theft happening in the case of blocking ads.
Your claim about "the vast majority of people" is patently absurd -- because you have not provided and almost certainly do not possess any evidence to substantiate it -- and lacks a basis in fact. Regardless, we do not reason about these things based on the fluctuating opinion of the masses. There is no case in which blocking ads meets "the common definition of theft".
Oh wow. I seriously considered working at comma (the company I believe George Hotz is referencing in that post) once. After reading "[Elon Musk] […] had all the same ideas as me", I feel like I dodged a bullet.
Here's the command it sounds like you're looking for:
`journalctl --grep="search string"`
You can limit it by time period like this:
`journalctl --since=-6h --grep="search string"`
Note that there's a separate user journal (such as for things that show up with an indication in the systray), accessible like this when in a shell as that user:
Also, if you really want, SysV still exists and works. You can setup a system with SysV and syslog-ng and have the good ol' service run system and flat log files back.
Thanks, but today I avoid troubleshooting it, I just accept the roadblocks and escape to my windows+msys2 installation as soon as possible. I find this combination a better gnu-based system and better upside / downside balance, which is all I need on desktop. Even logs usually get written to text files cause windows system logs are rarely used by regular apps and unixy services.
I’m not a gnu vs linux pedant, but gnu never let me down like that, and linux is really just an implementation detail underneath that I’m free to replace without compromising key functionality.
Do you think autistic 17 year olds should be restricted in their ability to access the world's knowledge, as compared to their allistic peers? How do you envision that working the next year, when they're 18 years old?
More broadly, how do you justify blaming the parents? Do you figure companies should be allowed to market a service to teenagers (or the general populous) which suggests they harm or kill themselves?
There's degrees to it, regardless of them being 18 y/o, I assume he's not aware enough to emancipate, therefore, there's reasonable cause for the parents to act and block here (The parents may be aware enough to make the call, I guess that would fall under their responsability)
Him being at all on the spectrum means a bit less than the actual degree at which he is, I may be on it as well (Albeit slightly), had unrestricted internet access, and while I'm not confident on saying I would do it differently than what my parents did, I have many arguments for limiting some of it even for an aware and allistic kid
It's a large scale problem, I can't expect the parents to know the intricacies of everything on the internet, but I'd expect them to try and be aware of those parts their kid does take interest to a degree their competency allows
Regardless, while I've always considered this kind of chatbot something a child should be strictly kept away from, because you can't know when it will tell a child to do this, or to glue pizza for a less dramatic example
I'm okay with it not being marketable to children, but the steps neccessary to limit them further than that make me uneasy
I'm trying to center around MQTT, myself, but looking for a way to use many of the wonderful integrations created by the Home Assistant community. I'm also trying to find a good solution to "react to state changes".
I've replaced all of HA with just some Python interacting with an MQTT server. I just script all the automation and don't have to care about the other 90% of what HomeAssistant brings to the table.
Not for everyone obviously but it's simple and works well.
I haven't because what's described didn't really suit my needs. I can run my own daemon that will handle the integration with MQTT, and that's all I needed.
Consider leveraging the HA ecosystem of integrations, but for automations add Node Red. There is a well maintained WS node to HA that lets you call any service/action in HA and listen for events or device state changes. https://flows.nodered.org/node/node-red-contrib-home-assista...
Along with everything else NR provides like MQTT pub/sub, only limit is imagination and time. I've been doing this for years. Another moving piece I know, but it has been bullet proof for me
What I said is obviously correct, especially historically, and you pointed out exactly why: medium travel, which is far more prevalent than simply modern suburbia. Have you even been outside a city? Take a quick glance at history and you will see just how crucial private transport for medium-long distance is in America. Horses and buggies have been a mainstay before the car. Rail is simply too inflexible to support medium travel in sparsely populated areas. And medium travel is what I would classify most rural Americans are from their nearest grocer. Long distance via train, that makes sense. A centralized rail system, such as subway, in a city also makes sense to cover medium distances. However, we already have the infrastructure to handle medium distances without new expensive rails, that being highways. The cost to fit rails across the entire US would be enormous, and that’s ignoring the long term costs such as staffing and maintenance.
In my small town, we have roughly 125 people. We are, roughly, 35 minutes away from the nearest grocery store, or about 40 miles. Too long to walk or bike in a reasonable time. You could use a motorized bike but the amount of food for a family would be unwieldy. The only viable solution is to drive via car, because you need the trunk space. And both options to get there require roads. Now, let’s suppose we magically replaced highways for rails. What happens is simple: either the government is bleeding immense amounts of money orchestrating train rides to places where no one is regularly using it, or certain less populated areas are underserved.
That is incorrect. This is not the only legal way to design this.
I own a Volkswagen ID.4, also an EV with electronic door handles. The door handles also function as the mechanical emergency release. When the handle is only slightly pulled, the electronic release opens the door. When the handle is fully pulled twice, the mechanical release opens the door. The car also has (electronic) child safety locks, and is legally sold in the US.
No, you don't. You have a 5th amendment right not to incriminate yourself. That means:
1. You must have committed a crime, which is not a given in a traffic accident.
2. You may not be coerced by the government into incriminating yourself. You are not protected from your property incriminating you. Imagine how absurd a world that would be: the government couldn't use a bloody knife as evidence of a knife attack because the knife was owned by the attacker.
Importantly, you'll also note that if you try not to provide evidence against yourself in civil discovery, you'll end up in a world of shit involving contempt of court.