Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | moritz's commentslogin

and they have a first-party one now as well

https://github.com/apple/container


I haven't tried it. colima also simplifies linux VMs which is more of an analog to WSL2 than just running containers. It has really nice integration with Incus as well, if you like persistent system containers.

> colima also simplifies linux VMs

lima does, not colima (well it does because it's lima under the hood)

https://github.com/lima-vm/lima


I also use colima mostly, it‘s great! (the Apple container thing de facto requires macos 26+)


Well… that’s handy.

assembler?


You‘ll notice a lot of "I found"s and "my hunch"s and similar in the comments.

There aren’t many comparative benchmarks, and obviously the design of such a benchmark is difficult, but, e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09101

In this benchmark, models can correctly solve Rust problems 61% on first pass — A far cry from other languages such as C# (88%) or Elixir (97%, no static typing whatsoever).


First pass is not that important today. All coding agents run until they get it right or hit a limit.

Having to tweak code and compile more often makes things slower, but strict compilers also help you find bugs faster and navigate the codebase. I think the two effects balance out and leave you with safer code in the end. And that's not counting the performance benefits of a compiled language.


Is the code open source? It‘s not part of the protocol design system?


Correct, it's not part of Protocol. It's in this repo: https://github.com/mozmeao/springfield


Do they have the design system open source somewhere?


Yes, you'll find it in this repo: https://github.com/mozmeao/springfield

Search for "flare" if you're looking for the CSS.


Considering the post ends with a link to the author's consultancy page, I'm guessing not.

If your team is rethinking its front-end foundation, get in touch.


Related hot take

Maybe thats why one of the not-so-bad ideas how to go about distributed systems came from a guy who was trained as a physicist and used to complain to his fellow programmers that “a lot of systems actually break the laws of physics”[1]?

> In distributed systems there is no real shared state (imagine one machine in the USA another in Sweden) where is the shared state? In the middle of the Atlantic? - shared state breaks laws of physics. State changes are propagated at the speed of light - we always know how things were at a remote site not how they are now. What we know is what they last told us. If you make a software abstraction that ignores this fact you’ll be in trouble.[2]

[1]: “The Mess We’re In”, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKXe3HUG2l4 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19708900


And yet we have CRDTs.


CRDTs are eventually consistent data structures


One can skip the Erlang-specific things/the description of the programming language.

Just the first 2 chapters (~30p) + the Conclusion (~10p) contain a lot of useful food for thought.


In the Elixir ecosystem (where documentation is considered a "first-class citizen" in the language), you can run code examples as part of your test suite in a similar fashion ("doctest"): https://elixir-recipes.github.io/testing/doctests/


> documentation is considered a "first-class citizen"

How exquisitely Knuthian!



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: