Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mtoner23's commentslogin

how about they try to make their cars profitably first....

looks like they're profitable already if counting cars and software on them.

https://rivian.com/newsroom/article/rivian-releases-third-qu...


They'd rather make their board and CEO profitable first...

America has much more lawyers per capital than almost all European countries

Such a boring color. Sad :(

Probably some function of your location to data centers. I find hbo max to be aysmal these days. But I've learned to just stop caring about this stuff since no one else in my life does

https://xkcd.com/1015/

Now you can be mad about two things nobody else notices.


It'll be around until they realize it makes 0$, and costs them millions per year in salaries/stock. then it will quietly die

You think they wouldn't have done that napkin math before deciding to acquire it?

Anthropic uses a lot of bun. In fact, they bet the farm on it.

I'm confident a surgeon in America is paid more than 100$ for a surgery. They are paid about 400k a year on average. Do the math yourself.

On the other hand you provided no details as to where the money actually goes. It's not a simple proble, and part of the problem is that our doctors are paid a lot more than in peer nations


Iowa city doesn't even run buses on the weekends/holidays. I really don't think this should be a model for real urban centers


https://www.icgov.org/government/departments-and-divisions/t...

Most of the routes run Monday thru Saturday. Schedules are something that are easily changed to support demand.


Models are typically smaller scale/scope... So a "real urban center" could probably easily provide service that smaller cities can't.

As to why Iowa City doesn't run on Sundays and Federal Holidays:

The University is about half the population of the city. The University runs a separate "Cambus" system[1] (that the community can also use) and after-hours routes for students[2].

We're also still in relatively early days of finding out how Iowa City residents use public transit when there's no barrier. For instance, they stopped running the downtown shuttle and reduced the number of stops downtown[3] because downtown is relatively dense, walkable, and student-heavy (i.e. mostly young, healthy, ambulatory people) and served by the University.

There's also a growing interest in adding service to nearby towns and adding Sunday service, even if it's in a limited capacity.

1: https://transportation.uiowa.edu/cambus/cambus-service-calen... 2: https://safety.uiowa.edu/nite-ride 3: https://www.icgov.org/Home/Components/News/News/2165/390


So there is nothing to learn her at all?


If you want to look at successful systems, would you look at Paris, London, Berlin, Tokio, Münich, Zürich .... or Iowa City?


I wouldnt call the Munich one successful as in "nailed it". the shortcomings are many and increasingly visible


Everybody loves to complain about their own city, but compare it to US cities and its fine. I just listed a bunch of European cities that I have visited and seemed fine. My point is that if you want to 'learn' there are lots of places that you can take a look at.


Why are you picking on Iowa City? Anti-Americanism? Or is your prejudice more narrowly against the Midwest?

If I want to look at succesful systems, IDGAF where they are, but how they operate.


Are about being serious? Its not 'Anti-American' to point out basic facts that literally everybody knows.

Let's just look at some basic comparison between Iowa City and my own city of the same population (mine is somewhat larger in metro city):

about 1.05 million trips

about 50.1 million trips

Its not even close. Why would you look at some tiny US city that doesn't even have actually good results if you compare it to anybody even halfway competent. Why not look for evidence in systems that are better by LITERALLY EVERY METRIC?

That's the basic issue with looking to the US cities for evidence. Their baseline is so pathetic that 'improvements' isn't really that significant.

So maybe its time to start giving a fuck, and not cherry-picking examples to confirm your bias. Actually learn from the systems that achieve the best results.


Good thing there are plenty of other cities with free bus lines and no one saying “no we have to do everything exactly like Iowa City”!


most aftermarket tints are too dark and dont allow pedestrians to see into the car to see if they going to be hit by the driver. its illegal in most places but cops dont do anything about it.


In eastern europe they do. It's a decent revenue stream. The loop for many friends is:

Put on tint.

Get pulled over (hopefully) a while later

Police demand you remove it and usually write you a ticket for ~50 eur

Maybe you plead that the car is your dad's if it's not registered to you and get to keep the tint if they decide to do you a favor

Otherwise you remove it and go pay another X eur a week later to have new one put on

Since there's no license point deduction, it's just a money/inconvenience issue.



what driver?


I find most people can't accurately sort the two though. They perceive what others do as within their control and it drives them mad


Idk man look around america rn. People in my neighborhood are getting dragged into unmarked vans off the street


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: