There are show notes open for PRs for folks to add too. See if someone does over the next few days: https://github.com/oxidecomputer/oxide-and-friends/blob/mast...

Open offer for Oxide and Friends stickers for anyone dropping a PR: https://mastodon.social/@ahl/109598726893101647

I second this one. This was a great book.

There are some follow ups to the final project I like

Compile to WASM so you can run on the web: <https://hands-on-rust.com/2021/11/06/run-your-rust-games-in-...>

Port to the Bevy ECS: <https://saveriomiroddi.github.io/learn_bevy_ecs_by_ripping_o...>

Oh cool I wasn't aware of these. Thanks for sharing, both look very interesting. I like the idea of reusing projects to teach different tech :)

Looks great!

2 out of 10 voters use machines that don't have a paper trail like you suggest.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/paperless-pennsylvania-c...

It wasn't, but you could have had multiple issuers of currency. Not that it ever got big enough to flex that part of the protocol.

This would be made easier in Namecheap offered Secondary nameserver support. For example, DNS host at Namecheap, but use Linnode as a secondary.

What the heck is up with the URL?

I know, right?

Normal:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/how-a-german-soda-became-ha...

Abnormal:

http://www-refresh.vice-motherboard-test.appspot.com/blog/ho...

where did someone get ahold of that URL to begin with....random appspot test server? some dev probably not happy to see that in the wild heh.

May I suggest adding a link to the http://platform.qbix.com in your README.md

Yep - we haven't completed it yet so even though the platform is already opensourced under GPL and we are committing to it bazaar-style and not cathedral-style, it's not yet been properly marketed.

I just wanted to illustrate how just opensourcing things isn't enough. You need marketing, PR or organic notoriety. And often that takes resources. Once, I met Eben Moglen and he yelled at me for half an hour simply for taking investors for my company. I explained to him that "free software" doesn't solve the economics for entrepreneurs who start new projects. You still need to use resources. Later when I sent him the link to github he said he was wrong but stopped short of an apology. Quite a strange guy.

Here's my question: What was the board thinking to put him in place? It's not as if Eich won a contest just by inventing one of the most widely distributed programming languages, there were folks who decided he was the best to lead Mozilla forward. How did they go so wrong?

Here is the python source

https://github.com/pythonium/pythonium.github.io/blob/master...