Something else is afoot in the markets, I wouldn’t take rando tweets at face value, especially if they’re confirming a narrative you’re biased to accept.

https://www.citadelsecurities.com/news-and-insights/2026-glo...

The problem is that inefficient systems will cost even more as you scale their use, but gains from such systems are not guaranteed, and profits even less so.

How much are you spending before you even see a $1 of revenue?

Nice tool, but the agentic workflow doesn’t sound cost efficient.

Fair enough, I spend a maximum of 200 a month given I use the MAX plan from CC. I don't find myself every hitting the weekly limits - but recently I've gotten close!

This is marketing, not reality. The only “job destruction detector” anyone needs to keep track of is non-farm payrolls.

The best way is to publish papers and go to conferences

Thanks for the input! Conferences are definitely on my radar (like the ASME or MRS fall meetings). However, as a solo, bootstrapped software founder, the 6-12 month peer-review cycle for publishing an article on my own is a bit too slow for my runway. That’s exactly why I'm hoping to partner with an existing lab—I bring the fast-moving AI architecture, and they bring the publishing pedigree and physics validation. Have you seen any founders successfully bridge that gap without having to spend a year writing papers first?

There were always multiple crises in the world at any one time. We’re just aware of them happening concurrently now because of the internet and global connectivity.

These types of frameworks never resolve the core problem with agents, which is they don’t really think and so are prone to getting stuck in infinite loops even if they’re wrong. I haven’t used this framework, but my guess is that Devil’s Advocate will be the most prone to this problem. But who knows.

Great idea, I would start by speaking with a trained educator at a university or similar.

Maybe also get some other people on board to create a certified program so if your program doesn’t work out for the student, they can get some credit for spending/wasting time with your group.

Other thing is safety, if you’re dealing with young people and involve other adults, you want proper and lawful mechanisms to protect the kids and yourself.

Besides that, teaching is a skill by itself, and teaching poorly can have the opposite of the intended effect.

If AI will be so capable that it will work flawlessly without human intervention, then why can’t replaced employees use AI employees to start their own companies, and set up competition to existing vendors of all kind. Retail, ads and marketing will be still be kings, and the next competition will be AI vs. AI.

Sure, one agent will be fine in that setting. But the dynamics and requirements change you have multiple agents who need to coordinate tool use and task assignments.

beads solve that and they use CLI not MCP.