You're absolutely right. Some orgs have huge lists. We do suggest the split but it's rather subjective so we also provide the tools to let sponsors boots & exclude.
Because they kinda caught the opportunity? If Google didn't, someone else would.
> If Google isn't bringing anything to the table, how come they are so dominant and raking in so much money? Why couldn't Yahoo compete?
> But Google has been one of the biggest blessings ever for small businesses and individual founders trying to make a living.
Please note that competition in search market is different from providing small businesses with advertising opportunities. The "blessings" came from their position being the dominant search provider, not from their being Google.
> If Google didn't, someone else would.
And where are they? The opportunity is always there and always has been for any tech company willing to rise to the challenge.
> Please note that competition in search market is different from providing small businesses with advertising opportunities.
Search and advertising has the same function: Reaching out to your public. If we look at the humane side instead of the business side, Google helps individuals with a message get a voice and reach out to the world in a way that would be impossible before. Only social media can compete in this, but they are much more heavily censored and suffer much worse discoverability.
I mean, your argument could be applied to any business or anybody who does anything. But the ground truth is that Google did it and kept doing it right for many years. Another dominant actor might have decided to do things other ways, such as maybe letting local business boards decide who gets to appear in online search.
How about cloud storage? iCloud, OneDrive, Google Drive, etc. Good apps support those out of box; for desktop install their client and use the file as you normally would.
