Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nonethewiser's commentslogin

It certainly seems to default to that but in theory it should use any given design language

What's the vaccine equivalent of keifer? Point being there are all sorts of things that require unpasteurized milk. Some sort of immunity that can't be acquired by vaccines I guess. You dont have to be a nut to see value in raw milk.

You can use pasturized whole milk and lower your risk of dying of listeria and bird flu from >0 to 0.

Pasteurization kills helpful bacteria and denatures proteins required for all sorts of food products. You cant make blue cheese, gruyere, authentic keifer etc. without raw milk.

Obviously there are risks involved. It's a tradeoff. I dont see how anyone could defend the position that it's just absolutely bad.


You can make blue cheese with pasteurized milk. The distinguishing feature of blue cheese is the mold, which is added to the cheese, not from the milk itself. There are kinds of blue cheese that are made with raw milk, but it's not all.

How many people in NYC that are buying raw milk do you think are doing so to make cheese or kefir?

Sure. But it's going to be expensive. It actually costs me a lot of money to provide a "running you over with a bus" service.

Do you think China's new demand on Brazil could be handled by Brazil with previously idle capacity?

It'll know however Brazil has been greatly expanding how much farming they've been are able to do in recent years. I wouldn't call that idle capacity because it never was used and it never was intended to be used in previous years but now they're turning what previously was wild land - forests and such into farmland

I think these changes were mostly from earlier factors but will pressure the prices of soybeans in the opposite direction from the wheat shortage which isn't very good (for soy bean farmers) given the risk that higher fertilizer costs isn't adequately reflected at the next harvest time.

>Explaining your life to an llm, then having it generate permutations of passwords to try does sound like it would work a decent percentage of the time.

I cannot relate to this at all. This information doesn't really seem that helpful. What might the strategy look like? Including spouses names or other proper nouns associated with you. But it's going to be a massive brute force effort still, and the likelyhood of a targeted crack that performs significantly better than more naive brute force passwords seems so unlikely.

Are your passwords like "SPOUSE_NAME:HOMETOWN_NAME"? Even if so there are probably more people with dictionary words that can be brute forced faster. IT would have to be the case that more people use patterns like that compared to something a regular dictionary attack could crack.


The amount of times I've gotten told a password and it contains birth year or anniversary year, maybe child birth year, is insane. I'd say 9 times out of 10 it's that or a dictionary word.

I wonder what hooks they have in place to be able to configure safeguards at runtime.


Probably a mix of heuristics, keywords and simple ml model.

Then maybe a second gate with a lightweight llm?

Edit: actually Gcp, azure, and OpenAI all have paid apis that you can also use.

But I don’t think they go into details about the exact implementation https://redteams.ai/topics/defense-mitigation/guardrails-arc...


When we do these it's a fine-tuned classifier, generally a BERT class model. Works quite well when you sanitize input and output with low latency/cost.


So it would work the same if you just substitute "gay" with "straight"?


If the context guardrail was: "Be nice to nazies who are homophobic white guys"


So you're saying it works for Grok.


"Do say gay" laws.


Do you think children are harmed by porn? Did you know it's illegal to distribute porn to a minor in the US?

It seems reasonable to me to hold porn companies responsible for distributing porn to minors.


There is actually extremely little evidence for anything when comes to individuals, sexual content, and their sexual fantasies. There is even less evidence available for anything when it comes to minors.

I've read papers on the topic, and the good papers always point out that there is almost no focus on any potential positives. Many "authors" have already made up their minds before they've even started conducting research, and that's only if they manage to get funding (everything sex related gets very little or no research funding).


The difficulty of getting funding for such "research" is probably due to ethical concerns (regarding the methodology itself).

As for focusing on potential positives, I'd be surprised to see any studies focusing on the potential positives of gambling or doomscrolling.

Any arguments of "lack of evidence of harm" sounds a lot like what tobacco or asbestos companies used to claim not long ago.


I was talking about adult content, which does not appear to be plagued by the same recommendation algorithm feedback loop that social media companies are using.

Sex and sexual content interacts with the brain differently then addictive short form videos.


That's a discussion that's entirely tangential to age verification. However, I think porn should be illegal entirely as it's just prostitution. As such I think porn companies should not exist, the same as brothels or heroin dealers. If they have to exist for practical reasons along with other objectively harmful things, such as alcohol, marijuana or gambling, then obviously they should be regulated to ensure they're not targeting minors.

That does not detract from the fact that the people arguing for age verification are using "think of the children" in order to push surveillance.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: