Changing code without justification is still very bad.
LLMs aggressively rewriting parts of the system break the mental models people have built. The less people have a accurate mental model of the system the more quality will suffer.
Most emotional attachment to code I have seen is a byproduct of understanding the code and being averse to breaking that mental model.
Doesn't mean sometimes people need to look past that and accept change. Reducing attachment though implies less people are understanding the code.
On a personal level it would be demoralizing to see some billionaires live multiple lifetimes, but only a tad more demoralizing than seeing the wealth disparity we already have and the changing line of idiot faces at the top.
> People and their AI agents are making the act of being on the internet extremely annoying, and the problem is about to get much worse.
As much as I have a distaste for what passes as "AI agents" as a technology, I think it's a mistake to put any of the blame on the tech. People are the problem!
We've been making a societal mistake for a long time, accepting and even celebrating obnoxious people who do obnoxious things. Letting your AI agents loose on others is one such obnoxious thing.
They are more than a accessory. You wouldn't say someone who funds a contract killing is merely an accessory to murder. VCs should likewise be considered as principal offenders, unless there is proof that the company was not transparent with the VCs.
Yes they are quite good, but are not able to run on a 16GB RX 9070.
Quantized Qwen 3.8 Flash Next could maybe run eventually on that card with a highly optimized inference engine that dynamically caches the hottest layer experts. Even then you run into some hard limits.
From what I can tell NixOS still has no support for AppArmor or SELinux.
reply