Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nova22033's commentslogin

This is a gift to Anthropic. Our model is so good the US government banned it...Oh, and we're doing an IPO soon.

And the US gov could pull the rug out from under our business at any time? That's confidence inspiring?

How is this good for their long term revenue?


That doesn't make sense. Presumably AI search costs more


In my opinion, being "Not American" or "Not Chinese" is not a good business model long-term.

Exactly..

What happens when the capability of American models far exceeds the capability of non-American models? Wouldn't companies using American models have a huge advantage?


Yep. This. That's why I don't think it's a viable business model.

Also, OpenAI and Anthropic will just open EU offices and subsidiaries.


doing much outside of 'grok is this true'

Hey...don't forget "grok is this person jewish(hint hint)"...or..just "grok do your thing"

https://www.threads.com/@trosen76/post/DTlYw7sFXvR


OkCupid and Match do not have to pay a financial penalty


Company X sued by company Y shouldn't automatically translate to company X did a bad thing. Companies get sued all the time.


Why does DoD need claude? I thought xAI was "less woke" and far better than claude


Why is it wrong for US diplomats to advocate for a policy that clearly benefits US companies?


The argument that it’s wrong would be because it’s bad for US consumers and those abroad too. There’s monopolization arguments, and there’s clear evidence of wrong-doing by these companies already.

Even for US tech folks like HN, I doubt it would help us. US companies hoard their profits and power, so most people here would see no benefit. It’s yet another move to protect rich corporations and the corporate cronies of the most corrupt administration in US history.


The data sovereignty initiatives have been massively promoted by US policy. All this advocacy will achieve is make the US look even less trustworthy.


The article didn’t say it was wrong by my reading: it reported that it’s happening.

That said: “benefits US companies” != good public policy for the US as a whole. It’s explicitly trying to interfere in how other countries govern themselves for the benefit of shareholders, not because it’s necessarily good policy.

It’s also something we wouldn’t necessarily appreciate if done to us by our allies. If we have any actual allies left given all of Trump’s tariffs and threats against other countries.


In a normal, mature government, advocacy for your nation's products would be reasonable, and even then, would be controversial in this instance. "Do not protect your citizens' privacy, our citizens might get ideas".

I think it's the assumptions that are baked in with the Trump regime. No subtlety, no mutual benefit, do as we say or else.


and that's just my doordash order..


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: