Let’s be real for a moment; why didn’t YouTube do the same for the russian collusion charade? How about the many video clips used out of context to manipulate the public? YouTube, google, facistbook etc are all surrogates for the DNC.
the idea of a safe harbor date is also one which we will see shorty, has little relevance.
I would argue that the difference lies mostly with evidence: there is hard evidence of Russian propaganda campaigns via social media, and many lengthy (and non-partisan) investigations and reports backing it up. Not so for claims of election fraud this year, which we can tell by the scores of cases which have been lost or thrown out because the claims have no foundation in reality.
If there is fraud, I want to get to the bottom of it. Which is why I’ve been watching the court cases (plenty which have come before trump appointees), none of which are making progress.
The reality is that the election feels less secure this year because of the efforts by Trump et al to make it seem so. This is not normal and is not at all like the Democratic response in 2016. Hilary Clinton conceded the night of the election. The election is turning out to be significantly less close this year than it was in 2016. Trump’s response to loosing is to make it feel like he lost unfairly, by spouting nonsense and not following the norms of his predecessors. The norm of conceding when the election becomes clear is an important part of the process which helps people trust the results.
Trumps refusal to do so and resulting disinformation campaign is the reason the election isn’t trusted by some people this year. It’s disinformation: lies spread with the intent of misleading people.
In 2016, Democrats didn’t complain that widespread fraud occurred in the election and that it should be overturned. The general feeling was that it sucked to loose and a few figures even said we should at least give trump a chance. There wasn’t a disinformation campaign.
As it became more clear that Russian social media propaganda was fairly influential in polarizing voters in a certain direction, there was a lot of outcry about it. The fact that Trump never did anything about it is partly why it seems like there was collusion.
The reason why it may make sense for YouTube to make this move is just given how things have played out. The campaign has had a chance to prove that there was fraud, and it couldn’t provide any proof. These theories have had their day in the courts. Are we really loosing anything specifically by deplatforming it at this point? It’s had a chance to prove itself.
At this point in time, the disinformation is very hurtful to our society.
All of that said, I’m really not sure we should be ok with YouTube’s deplatforming abilities. It’s a tough situation since large media sites are becoming much more like public places than private. And obviously we have some laws against, e.g., causing unwarranted panic in public places because of the harm it can cause.
But I think this is a totally different situation than what you’re comparing it to.
Because it wasn't a charade. The US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found that collusion occurred between Russian nationals, and possibly Russian intelligence, and the Trump campaign.
I find hn filled with comments like this which are apologetic in tone and completely dismiss the essence of the OP. Rather than just state “The open web can survive” please explain WHY you have that opinion. That would make for more constructive discourse.
Hi Peter, sorry I understand that this isn't the ideal setup for a demo. Right now, all OpinionX surveys are automatically set up to collect email addresses (mainly because we haven't implemented a caching system to enable participants to re-join existing surveys).
We've just linked a normal OpinionX survey as our demo for now as we haven't built something specific that's better suited for a landing page demo yet - this is on our to-do list though, we know it's not the most user friendly for trying it out.
Since there are so many distros, it is honestly hard to keep up with (even if you are involved with the commuity). In (very) broad strokes (i.e. if you use a well supported distro), you can expect:
- Calls and SMS seem stable, even when the phone is asleep
- Battery life Screen on time is measured in hours, and sleep time is measured in ~1 day
Thank god I switched back to windows early this year. I absolutely love it and I do not foresee me returning to Apple for a considerable amount of time.
You should know that Windows includes a similar feature (to call home and report file hashes and the user's IP for example) called SmartScreen, and with default settings it also triggers on every single application launch in the OS.
I use both Windows and Mac but I would never consider Windows some patron saint. The telemetry and dark patterns in Windows are much worse than what Apple does. Windows literally advertises its own browser in different parts of your OS and will regularly change the default back to Edge after updates.
But overall I am pretty happy with Windows being my daily driver now that they have WSL.
- how does this product help users get past ATS? I wasn't clear what this product does
besides helping with some generic design.
- "experts" in the business of resume writing and folks who claim to review many resumes
on a regular basis often recommend either a simple, no-frills resume, optimized for each job
applied to or a "pretty" resume (images, color, exotic fonts, multiple columns), similar to
the examples on your page. Can you share why you believe your design should be used over a
simple, primarily text resume?
Hmm though question.
If you don't know how ATS extract data, use a text-based resume and the right keywords. A word document is most of the time, the best choice. But if you know how the data extraction works, you can play around with the layout and design. Imagine we have a scale from -4 to 4. I will put you at 1 with the template because the data can get extracted in the right order, and the keywords for the sections are commonly used.
But the rest is (currently) up to you. Read the job description correctly. What keywords are they using there? Skills mention earlier are more important than the ones at the bottom.
Whether a "pretty" resume is better than a simple text-based resume is highly subjective.
So for me, I would prefer the "pretty" one. It communicates to me that the candidate put in the extra work. Or at least a bit more effort than the simple one. But again, highly subjective. I got actually hired because the CV I created caught their eyes. It was mentioned during the interviews. That is why I created resoume :)
Hmmm...there is no "right" way to pronounce it, since it is a made up word, but I pronounce it like this: Resoume(ˈrɛzou:meɪ)
Long response, but I hope that answers your question :D
I’ve used various yubikeys in personal environments over the past 7 years and found them to be a gimmick rather than a useful tool.
They are quite versatile and can be used for many different use cases which is part of the problem in my opinion. While not a total dummy, I found yubikey software and documentation to be difficult to use and configure and a pain to find how to setup the key for common scenarios. This brings me back to ideal users, probably corporate use where a dedicated team can support users for the specific use cases.
the idea of a safe harbor date is also one which we will see shorty, has little relevance.
https://hereistheevidence.com/