Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | platz's commentslogin

I like how OBS has subsumed (often low-quality) screen recording apps for me; apart from the apps original intent for streaming

Screen recording isn't built into your OS?

Neither the Windows Game Bar nor MacOS's QuickTime offer any sort of meaningful control over the codec or destination. Once you have OBS installed, you have pretty much zero reason to use start-g or cmd-shift-5.

Plus, on a Mac you can't even record your audio using the built in recording solution, you need a third party audio driver for that.


if your definition requires universal observer agreement you already have that issue with special relativity / light cones / the spacetime metric.

many worlds posits a single universal quantum state it's just only partially accessible to observers, which is different from saying that it simply doesn't objectively exist.

maybe it depends on your definition of objective


In the 2010-2020 era, readers of Hacker News used to know how to read Haskell and had strong opinions (pro and con) of it.

That era is now over.


The problem is that this is not only about Haskell's fundamentals. It's about them being extended with backpack, an extension that very few people use.

And honestly, I don't see the point there either. I know that backpack is meant to solve some problem everybody has, but I haven't been able to fully understand what that problem is. Specifically on this article, I don't see the gain over using a type class.


There are still dozens of us!


Maybe in 2010, but you have an idealized view of 2020 HN.


peak FP debate was 2015/2016-ish


I assume it depends on the amount of detail you're expecting to get.

Generally there are some broad categories:

1) tracked vs untracked mounts

2) shooting single frames vs shooting with high FPS and processing that into a resulting image.


whoever came up with the name 'earworm' needs to be shot


Boltzmann Brains usually mean something is wrong in your cosmology


But taking this the other way around : it's also interesting that some cosmologies are known to be incorrect, because they would enable alternative forms of consciousness.


Or with our philosophy around anthropic reasoning. Or both.


Licenses communicate your intent; if you choose the most permissive one possible that is also implicitly communicated.


Actually, we're already past the peak of star formation in the universe. So the universe is well on its way winding down.. less and less stars are being created. We're seeing the universe more middle aged than especially young

https://www.reddit.com/r/space/s/0oVjIo0XMi


But how many of those stars would have been suitable for life ?

A huge star that’s going to burn out quickly isn’t conducive to complex organisms

Also in a huge star there’s less material to form planets in the first place


Where did the the values of the coupling constants between the various fields come from?

There are many parameters that do not have a reason for their value.


learning


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: