Well, there are tons of other things newly proven any LLMs, as well as lots of other things once termed creative and the domain of humans only, that LLMs and other models have surpassed the "creative" humans, that all you have to do is find one to realize that humans are not the only creative force on earth.
As far as I know, the controversy involves a pair of mathematicians using LLMs to solve the problem and another group who used LLMs to solve the problem. No one seems to be disputing the solution itself.
The controversy was that OpenAI may have stolen the work of mathematicians, which IMO is not hard to believe given they've stolen quiet alot for training data.
Don't you think the style of video looks a bit unprofessional? It's like the next iPhone being presented by the Apple CEO but using a vTuber avatar with subway surfer gameplay in the background.
I was griping about my day being ruined over the breakfast table and my son was interested. I showed him the video and he asked why there was an anime girl on the screen?
My response was "if you've worked with computers for any length of time, and you ever see a video of a terminal posted with an anime, catgirl, or furry overlay, you know something really bad is coming your way."
Which makes someone to think, whether Calif could not wait for the responsible disclosure. Or someone leaked the video for someone they should not have.
It's an agent system that basically embeds the core idea of CodeQL (Datalog extraction from codebases) and then allows a model to pose questions and answer them.
You're right, it's TTL not LRU. The authoritative server publishes a TTL with the record — "you may keep this for N seconds" — and when it's up the resolver has to ask again no matter how popular it is.
LRU does show up in resolvers, but as memory management: cache is full, evict the least recently used early. It can only make something disappear sooner than its TTL, never later.
It's time-based because there's no back-channel. An authoritative server has no idea who's holding a copy of its records, so it can't push an invalidation.
reply