No, not really. There's plenty of software out there that you still pay for, or pay a license for. e.g: LittleSnitch, Jetbrains IDe, Plex, Final Cut Pro, etc
I've heard that folks using using a mid-tier Anthropic model like Sonnet 5.5 easily run into limits. When I use GitHub Copilot (for work) with Anthropic models I can easily rack up quite a significant bill.
This is why I'm comparing value for the money.
While Google may not have the "best" models, what's the point if you hit a wall with Claude Code? The extra baseline quota with Anti-gravity could be worth it.
Regardless of how it was built, it's actually pretty cool to see actually. I've dabbled a little bit in Wayland and compositors in some attempts to build Wayland apps with some success.
What @pluc said basically. You could use stuff like https://bte.mills.io and https://git.mills.io/prologic/squint to help test/validate the "behaviour" of what is being developed/built. Try to think of yourself as the "Product Designer" and "Product Owner". Worry less about the _actual_ code itself, and more about how the software/product behaves. Write specifications that can be validated and ask yoru favourite coding assistant to ensure that those are validated.
IMO, we should probably have been yelling and screaming about this some 10-20 years ago when big-tech starting convincing us it was a good idea to store our personal data and private information on their so-called "Cloud" -- i.e: Someone else's machines.
reply