Because "we" want the assets now?

Do you have any particular evidence to support this claim?

The code comments are pretty clear tells

I don't really know what to tell you but the comments are definitely Claude. The result is pretty good but AI was definitely involved in the creation of this.

What?

Something can still be a crime even if it isn't effectively enforced.

Now that the story has been retracted, and the "real" image proven to be an obvious fake, are you mad that someone sought to manipulate you?

OJP has published a retraction. https://www.oregonjournalismproject.org/editors-note-october...

I'm confused. So was the flag really upsidedown or rightside up?

upside down. The retracted article was "debunking" the upside down picture, claiming it was fake.

https://archive.is/kRbug

So the debunkers using AI to make the upsidedown flag look like it was rightside up, were the actual deepfakers?

yes

>A Fai campaign supporter then provided a different video of the event to OJP that showed the flag right side up.

It would be interesting to know where the "corrected" deepfake originated.

That also contradicts the original article, which claims the right side up photo was "Provided by Nafisa Fai".

In that case, lmao at all the people who were downvoted to grey (or rather, the people who downvoted them into grey), despite being in the right.

screenshot for posterity: https://i.postimg.cc/vTCTyYZ1/Screenshot.png

It's comical because I posted this knowing that the publisher was blatantly lying. You could literally look at the image they posted for 5 seconds and spot what was wrong with it. I just wanted to see how many other people would notice. It's interesting the retraction come shortly after I posted it, though.

Also worth noting at the time of this comment the lovely fact-checking website Axios is also still blatantly lying. Absolutely crazy this is all getting swept under the rug.

It's not unreasonable to expect End Wokeness to be spreading more lies about Somalian immigrants, given his track record. But the truth here was obvious to anybody willing to simply look at the evidence.

Please just look at the bottom left corner of the "real" image.

As much as I hate to have to defend Jack Posobiec (aka EndWokeness), saving the "real" screenshot from this article and uploading it to OpenAI's verification tool[0] indicates that it, in fact, was AI-generated. I welcome any correction on this.

[0] https://openai.com/research/verify/

e: Okay, now I feel stupid for even bothering to do that. Look below her name and you'll see the leftovers of the old flag.

edit 2: Retracted. https://www.oregonjournalismproject.org/editors-note-october...

Even more damning seems to be the video of the event and cached images from google, which does not have an openai watermark (yes, verified myself).

https://x.com/kgallella/status/2112332869461045733

https://x.com/Honest_Bender/status/2112301833708519659

Of course it doesn't conclusively prove that the flag was definitely right side up, but you'd really have to bend over backwards to explain why Oregon Journalism Project's "debunking" is watermarked but the counter-debunkings aren't.

lol I didn't see that at all, wow they soooo poorly photoshopped this and then had their all friends in the media like Axios push their lies

Unless I’m missing something all of the pictures in the article and on X that it links to return as being AI generated?

There's only two images in the article, the "real" (fake) image (which appears twice), and the screenshot of the tweet; the latter returns "No OpenAI signals detected" for me, unlike the other.

I’m including all of the images linked in both.

And now that you’ve said that I’ve retried the same image 5 times and gotten AI 3 times and Not AI twice.

Something tells me that tools is about as reliable as Pangram.

Then just try looking in the bottom left corner of the "real" image to see the leftovers of the upside-down flag. The SynthID watermark isn't even necessary here to spot the obviousness of the fake.

Not terrific signs for the AI industry or the economies that have come to depend on them, perhaps.

But it is only two points of unclear data among a sea of exponential growth stories. It is just that the total debt amount and rates environment mean the industry has to hit an extremely small target which prices everything toward perfection.

No, it will not.