In a meaningfulness perspective yes you are right. But most content is written to get indexed by the engines and to drive traffic. I really feel like I could like totally automate this process with zappier and not even have to click on buttons. Just prompt whenever I want a new article and it is published on my niche website a minute later. Now imagine the amount of consistency power that gives you to try to rank on some keywords. I definitely see value in there. Ofcourse once your website is well ranked and your new posts are ranking high because of this consistency, on can begin writing by himself or hire human help.

Looking at it this way I find it truly game changing. Atleast I feel like there is a possibility.

I don't see the value in generating a mountain of content with an AI to trick the search engine into ranking you high. That's only good for attracting millions of visitors and hoping that 1% of them accidentally buys something from you.

I would rather build a great relationship and trust with a few thousand people. There is nothing an AI can help there. I don't have to be a crummy used-car salesman, and consistency is not about ranking, it's about your customers knowing that they can count on you for their needs. It's search engine proof too as presumably Google will keep changing things in a way that reflects reality, and reality is on your side if the people keep looking for you to scratch their itch.

This is a tutorial on how to make a blog post 100% automatically from just an idea. Questions that emerge are: is this SEO friendly? Can we tell a human written article from an AI one? If the web content goes towards automation, is it okay?

so you just read an article about someone giving away a 1.5B revenue company, and paying 17+M taxes on it to give it political power, and you are here telling us they are not poor because they did get some revenue out of this company they have been running until they gave it away to charity? Are you ok?

You aren't kidding. Some of the comments in here are baffling to me.

i think the post is more about how their competitor(copycat?) developed by an indie developer got acquired by a company and they still act like if nothing happened. Which means there is a company buying an indie made product, with the deal that they will not reveal that they got purchased, and than keep using the "indie" image to make better profit via Patreon..

Makertask is the place you can reachout to skilled people. Simply list a task, and we will make sure enough taskers see it. It is free for Hackers of HN, just use the coupon -> hackernews

i find it pretty useful. I would even pay a few dollars for more information and tips on how to improve myself over the competitor.

Sorry about that link problem. It now works fine: http://gazetor.com/howdoes.php

By the way, I would like to hear what you think about this project!

I just realized, I haven't left any notice on this post.

This is a website I have developed, because of two reasons:

1: I hate reading news with the bad design and ads all over the place that most popular newspaper-pages propose.

2: I wanted to be able to choose what I want to read about. As for music for example: We choose playlists and only listen to music that we enjoy. Than why do I have to read about Trump or Clinton on every news related website. I am not even in the US!

I would love a feedback from you guys. The design, the idea, or if the website is a good application of the idea.