Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | samwilliams's commentslogin

Infrastructure is an FPS now.

One day your job will be to play StarCraft but under the hood it will be your agents vs attacker's agents

Basically Enders Game

Ha! I literally built that last week: https://molecule.arweave.net/#/bugcraft

Enders Game but AI instead of aliens.

Today? Today is that day... probably a yesterday or two, as well.

I’m going to be running bongcloud into ghosts only. Uthermal style.

If this is the job description sign me up

Helpful article providing a less dense overview:

https://www.sciencealert.com/hoyle-wickramasinghe-thesis-com...


Put aside for a moment the name for the 'scheme' and consider the mechanism design differences between USD and Bitcoin:

- USD is needed in order to pay taxes on the US, but can be printed arbitrarily by a centralized mint.

- Bitcoin has no fundamental demand driver, but does have a truly capped supply.

Why is it so obvious that USD is a preferable scheme?


What sort of straw man response is this ? I never said USD is preferable. I said that fiat currencies are not ponzis.


I think the reference to retirement funds is in relation to the fact many of them are under collateralized. They need to take new investor's money to pay out old investors.

Some more background here:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/an-ohi...

The situation is pretty extreme. To be honest, these really _do_ look like Ponzi schemes.


No.

> Honestly index funds and cash from retirement savings is a ponzi scheme as well then

The comment was pretty clear: index funds, and cash.

Defined benefit pension funds are absolutely ponzis and should be outlawed. But this is not what OP said.


That first link is an incredible rabbit hole. Thank you for sharing.


You might enjoy "There Is No Antimemetics Division", a story (told in a series of short stories) about the idea of "Antimemes" (if memes are ideas that spread like viruses and can't be forgotten, antimemes are the opposite, they're not invisible but you can't remember them).

https://qntm.org/scp


Whistleblower that spoke to WSJ.


Hey dweller!

That isn't the mechanism. What happens instead is akin to an endowment for payment of storage. An outline is found here:

https://www.arweave.org/faqs.html#what-is-a-storage-endowmen...

And the paper has the full details:

https://www.arweave.org/files/arweave-yellowpaper.pdf


Thanks for the comment @blacksqr!

This calculator is outdated -- the current price of storage oscillates around $0.01/MB. The maximum single chunk size is also 10MB now, and you can send as many chunks as you like.


A community member built a blogging platform on our permanent, decentralised web (Arweave) today. You might want to check it out:

https://arweave.net/egqLRAbESk4BvrPZGwNM-koJZZU3_xYRb_G9-CYC...

Full disclosure: I started the Arweave project.

Sam


I think the HN crowd has always been interested in this sort of stuff? It certainly has since I started reading it (~7 years ago). One of the things that I like about HN is that we are not completely inward looking.

From the guidelines:

> On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.

You could certainly say that a BBC group being forced to sign a confession for attempting to conduct an interview 'gratifies one's intellectual curiosity' about the world, but it could certainly fall under 'Most stories about politics, or crime', too.

Either way, as you point out, once a post has over 100 points you probably have your answer!


  > once a post has over 100 points you probably have your answer!
It seems that we both agree that it's an Off-Topic article at face value and yet it is On-Topic based on the votes. The votes in effect override the second criteria of relevance, not unlike the final clause in Azimov's law of robotics.

Hence I'm genuinely curious about any shifts in the audience demographics that are occurring.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: