How would this affect you if you are using Github as a OAuth provider? Does Github mention under what conditions they are going to take away someone's username? No code? No OAuth? No activity?
Most corps are looking at GH EMU, which means you bring the username/email address, and that a public GH username is not possible. This also prevents the creation of public repositories.
But the religious groups are a protected class. Religion is something you choose. By that logic, it would be possible to discriminate against "Christians", "Muslims", etc.
One of the reasons I'm using Uber is that it's quite safe. Otherwise, most of the times you try to get into a cab, they try to rip you off. There are rigged meters, long routes, switching bills when you are paying, etc.
2. Managed to create a revenue stream and released more than 12 apps in the medical education field (Some completely new apps and some sub specialty apps of the original app idea)
3. Employed several full time people through out the years - in four different countries.
4. Our apps have been downloaded more than ~4 million times and been in the top ten medical apps around the world continuously.
5. Have been featured in many prominent blogs and medical college study guides (Also few research papers on medical education using gamification and pilot programs from universities)
6. Released more than 600 case studies in English and Spanish. (We are on the process of translating everything into French, Italian and Portuguese).
7. Doing quite good on revenue/profit and about ~200 content creators are working for us on contract basis right now.
It could be a competitor of someone who is using linode for their hosting. Rather than attacking a single server which would be easier to track down, it's probably easier to attack the whole network.
In any case, there is one question remains. How do facebook defines a "million dollar" bug if the security team is not aware of the damage it can do. Since this is not the first time this bug was reported, did they actually give a big bounty to the first person who did the initial report(Given that it can lead to this much damage)? Or just another small bounty saying that it's not a very important security flaw.