Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | seizethecheese's commentslogin

I agree that openAI should be held with a certain degree of contempt, but refusing to acknowledge anything positive they do is an interesting perspective. Why insist on a one dimensional view? It’s like a fraudster giving to charity, they can be praiseworthy in some respect while being overall contemptible, no?

Why even acknowledge them in any regard? Put trash where it belongs.

It could be D) messaging for current and future employees. Many people working in the field believe strongly in the importance of AI ethics, and being the frontrunner is a competitive advantage.

Also, E) they really believe in this. I recall a prominent Stalin biographer saying the most surprising thing about him, and other party functionaries, is they really did believe in communism, rather than it being a cynical ploy.


Not meaningful in what sense? Sure you’re right, if you mean in the sense of relevancy for the general public. But this definitely is meaningful as it relates to X and Threads relevancy to HN

This is a single Walmart and clearly dominated by outlier price swings. No, NPR didn’t make their own CPI. Surely there are other independent price baskets that actually attempt to do this, why choose this article, as interesting as it is?

I am not the one making the original assertion. I was pointing out that it relies on historically trustworthy statistics that the current administration is openly influencing.

Call the NPR methodology a canary or smoke test, if you will. Feel free to grab the brass ring if you want sources that you find more credible.


Really strange comment. You're offended by the implication that what we eat may impact our health?

Regarding the class comment, sure a access to some food is class based, but pretty much all westerners can afford basic "real food". I know because I've lived on minimum wage and could buy eggs, rice, beans, chicken thigh, etc.


Not the person you're responding to, but the thing that frustrates me isn't that they're saying to eat healthy, but that they're acting like that's the only thing we need to change, while actively deregulating pretty much everything else that also affects health.

Yes, obviously what we eat affects our health, I don't think that's ever been in dispute by any significant number of people (despite what the inbreds who love RFK Jr. seem to think), but part of the frustration is that they're acting that that can solely explain all chronic illnesses, ignoring things like air pollution (which they are actively deregulating).

Oh, also, RFK Jr. telling people to eat at Five Guys because they fry their fries in beef tallow is really dumb and is likely to lead to worse health outcomes.


Wait I thought that was shake shack, not five guys? Don't five guys use peanut oil...???


I think it was Steak and Shake, I think you’re right. Sorry.

Point still stands.


I mean I guess I didn’t say it explicitly but they are saying “eat better” instead of taking medicine and doing it while medicine becomes increasingly less accessible by most Americans. So yeah. Also not offended at all it’s just patently stupid and an abdication of the responsibility of the government. The government regulates and facilitates giving out medicine and if what you’re saying is true it doesn’t need to dictate to people how to eat since it also refuses to subsidize most people’s meals.

Interesting to see no ships in Hudson Bay, given its importance in early North American history.


It was only good as a way for the British to get into the north for fur trade, since the French controlled Canada/New France (and the St Lawrence/Great Lakes waterways)


Is it plausible that the libraries are so big? I mean, for example, NodeJS is in the order of 100mb and contains the whole v8 engine.

The Gmail app size has to be assets, right?


Static linking will do that. Imagine you have 400mb of binary objects your app depends on. Libraries your company uses for app analytics, SSO, 2FA, Corporate service bus api, etc. You statically link all those for your 50mb Swift UI app and bam, you’re in the 700mb range.


The use of Go will definitely do that, as it prefers to statically link everything.

https://go.dev/wiki/Mobile

If we had an entire POSIX OS built with Go, then we would be back to statically-linked UNIX prior to BSD.

https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/golang-statically-and-dyna...


can you build a Swift UI in go?


There is a single mention of Swift on the developer page that I posted.

"Note that you can also invoke GoHelloGreetings from Swift by importing Hello."

  @import Hello
  // ...
  let msg = Hello.GoHelloGreetings("gopher")


Oh lord…


That's a lot of code, though. I can't imagine common libraries so big. The Linux kernel is less than 100mb.


That would be the source code. The default debian kernel is around 12 MB but it could be much smaller.

It doesn't bundle full random external libraries compiled with debugging symbols and "whatever other stuff".


The neat thing about code is that there's no upper limit on how inefficient one can get.


It's literally "work expands to fill the available time" (s/time/cycles and memory/)


You'd be surprised what ends up dragged into where when you have a build system that makes it easy. Just look at the npm.js mess (and what kind of things ended up depending on what kind of other thing) if you want an example.


This is currently the top reply to the top comment. It’s classified at 89% negative by this model: https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased-fi...

Ironically, the above comment scored 99.9% negativity.


Is it “negative” though? I ran it through this model and it gave 99.9% positive. (You tell me if this model is substantively different from what you used.)

https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased-fi...


I’m not sure if this is the exact model used by OP, but it appears close, and it classifies your comment as positive at 99.9%.

https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased-fi...


I'd be curious to know how my comment scores if you cut it off after the bullet points.


Hi, if you find the time, please reach out to the email in my bio with the methodology and dataset you used. Did you only test one post or a whole set? Would be interesting to compare the setup. Thanks!


I linked to the model in my comment


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: