All of those countries (except the UK) have a ton of people who are cigarette smokers. For comparison, a third of french adults smoke tobacco. Most US adults who use nicotine don't do so via tobacco, with Japan (the third lowest in the group) having double the cigarette smokers than the US and France having 3-4 times as many.

Your use of OpenSSH in a single private network does not equate in any way or form using and distributing a non-ACL managed SSH client.

sounds like just adding complexity over traditional method of OpenSSH + key distribution (either via configuration management or ldap)

and now, bugs

No, it doesn't sound like it. Tailscale reduces complexity. It literally is key distribution with an ACL.

I work at a finance org with hundreds of engineers and thousands of technical users. You cannot be compliant with finance compliance frameworks using OpenSSH without audits and traceability and some source of identity management. That is exactly what Tailscale (or an alternative product) provides.

> and now, bugs

If you do it yourself, you now own that software entirely. Your comment lacks understanding of the complexity of real world scenarios.

You just need to implement an SSH CA. You can roll your own. Vault has an enterprise one. StepCA is suitable for smaller orgs.

All the benefit of the core SSH protocol as it's just key signing. It's honestly underrated.

Adding complexity would imply you're doing both. In this case it would be more correct to say you're trading the complexity of key distribution and access control via keys for the complexity introduced by tailscale ssh.

yep, this was obvious from day one.

I think it's exactly this. The rendering capabilities in a true world model would include the entire domain it exists in. This takes a ton of processing power.

Object permancence is apparently a task so difficult that even our own brains and those of many species of animals struggle with it. Maybe the problem domain lies in the fact that compared to a world model, our world is continous regardless of the observer's capabilities. If a tree falls in a forest with no one there to see it, it still falls. The same isn't true in a world model's view.

Fingerprinting for the PHP version, a proxy will tell you what it is most of the time as well.

  curl -sI http://stealmybitcoin.com/
  HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
  Server: nginx
  Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 22:01:11 GMT
  Content-Type: text/html
  Content-Length: 162
  Connection: keep-alive
  Location: https://stealmybitcoin.com/

Edit: Not so easy for this. ProjectDiscovery's httpx could not find the php version. Interesting.

This is an incredibly western/asian outlook on the world and not really true for the majority of it. Sorry.

Do you have any evidence to back up that assertion? I have several contrary examples. My mother travelled through much of South/central America as a 60 old, taking buses other means of transport, often she was invited to stay at people's homes. Similarly have a very good friend who as two early 30s women travelled through Iran and had similar experiences.

I want experienced small acts of kindness in many countries and in both rural and metropolitan areas. I do agree that different societies are more or less likely. In my mother's travels, she was met with a lot of distrust in Guatemala (but this was reasonably recent after the end of the dictatorship), similarly my best experiences have been in NZ (just walking around with a map in central Auckland often ended up with someone offering to drive you to where you needed to go).

You are both right in your ways. In-group trust arises naturally, while generalized trust requires constructed institutions.

Um yeah. The entirety of South Africa, including Joburg. Read "Let Africa Sink", or any other account of the local population.

You can't really describe post-colonialism Africa as a naturally peacefully formed society.

It wasn't peaceful pre-colonialism either

Care to elaborate? (Btw, Asia in itself is the majority of the world)

Some evidence

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qG4RUBPypF4

I live in a high trust neighborhood. Bicycles will sit around for a week or two before someone finally returns. Outside my neighborhood bicycles last about an hour at most.

Western = 1.3 billion people Asian = 5 billion people World = 8.3 billion people

How is 24% a majority in your imagination?

I don't know why people are even bothering to reply to a one sentence rage baiting comment. Let that useless comment fade into oblivion. It makes no sense other than him trying to create discussion.

Non insignificant parts of west are high-trust societies as well. Sadly, decreasing, and not only because of immigration from not-such places.

This is an attribute of a high-trust society, which we are rapidly stepping away from

“...and their cynicism about each other does more damage than their actual flaws.” ;)

Nothing. Because LVT is never proposed for non-rent seeking homeowners who live in their own home.

That's only true for this one implementation. But that gets messy when you have home buessiness that may involve some rent-seeking aspect. This is especially true once businesses figure out you can home office people instead of paying the land tax.

If you're rent seeking in your own home you can pay LVT.

Which specific proposal out of dozens all over the world do you claim to know? And once you have one carveout, the next one is not far. I'm being "disingineous or deliberately obtuse" because that's how the spin doctors and lobbyists are going to paint it.