Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sepokroce's commentslogin

Effortlessly compare AI models and unlock their full potential in your projects. Choose the best AI models based on accurate side-by-side comparisons. Works with ChatGPT, Cohere and J2 Complete.


Why does the bird look so angry?

I think a more balanced approach to the positioning of the eye might look better. It looks much less angry in the Android Adaptive version.



How can you hold the copyright on designs which are trademarks? I'm quite confused by "All rights reserved" in the footer. So, I must ask: are you trying to create an open directory or is this a proprietary project?


You can claim copyright on your rendition (all black versus the original color; or the text creating the logo in CSS or SVG) of the trademark in question. Whether that would hold up in court is another matter entirely.

That said, the site owner certainly holds the copyright on the site design, layout, textual content, etc. Just because it's a directory/portfolio of trademarked logos drawn by the artist doesn't mean the other content isn't covered.


Should work in Firefox 51 as well.


Which version of Firefox is that?


Surely not the future.


Not sure why you're getting downvoted. Problems with CSS at Scale are very real (as mentioned in the slide). But this is a super complicated solution. Its like one of the head-over-heels approaches in JoelOnSoftware blogs. Surely there has to be a simpler way.

Its good that the authors are trying. But just look at the picture on this article captioned "This is how intensely we’ve been thinking about CSS". That's where the whole complexity comes from I guess. Good solutions present themselves and fit naturally.


> Not sure why you're getting downvoted.

Because it doesn't contribute anything but nonconstructive criticism.

> Good solutions present themselves and fit naturally.

Complex problems require complex solutions.

Also, what's so complex and non-fitting about this solution? Explaining that (and your alternative solution) would be much better than simply criticizing as you and GP did.

> Surely there has to be a simpler way.

There's a technically simpler way: modules being part of the CSS spec. But they're not, so even if technically simpler as a solution, it's a political nightmare on which we developers have no control whatsoever.

Driving forward the status quo with hacks (like to-JS transpilers did) is nothing but beneficial. Hacks drive standards.

> "This is how intensely we’ve been thinking about CSS". That's where the whole complexity comes from I guess.

How much have you been been thinking about CSS and fighting its flaws? Obviously not a lot.


> Because it doesn't contribute anything but nonconstructive criticism.

No, it's just an opinion and a comment on the sensationalistic article (sub)title.


There is a simpler way. Even for large projects there is no need for the amount of CSS they usually have. It just takes some discipline and planning, alas that's often replaced by abdominations like BEM.


SEEKING WORK - Skopje, Macedonia - Remote - WordPress, Front-end Development, Visual Design.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/gocemitevski


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: