I'm a big fan of Min: http://minfwk.com/

995 bytes!

Thanks! I'm the creator of Min. Are there any suggestions or improvements you have?

My first impression of min is that it looks nice. Really, for it's goals, it's pretty tight.

As a branding thing, I'd change that URL. I get that it's short but minfwk.com doesn't really look like "Min Framework" to me. It just looks like a bunch of letters. A domain like mincss.com, getmin.com, minframework.com or something more legible would be better.

> My first impression of min is that it looks nice. Really, for it's goals, it's pretty tight.

Thanks! You have no idea how good that feels.

> As a branding thing, I'd change that URL. I have had minframework.com for a while and still do, but it seems too long (Right now it redirects to minfwk.com) but I just got mincss.com and I prefer it quite a bit. I'll update Github accordingly. Thanks for the suggestion!

Looks awesome. Little Snitch is one of the things I miss most from my Mac days and this looks like it will feel that hole nicely.

e: After trying it, yep, this is excellent. And far too good to be free. I almost feel guilty using it.

Thanks!

It's a for-profit site that runs off unpaid/donated microlabor. It's gonna take some serious gamification to keep that model palatable to contributors if/when the cash start rolling in (or they get a big exit, etc).

What on Earth are you talking about? iFixit, Wikia, and many others make money based on people generating high-quality content for free.

This is hardly some daring new business model.

The shift of focus away from lyrics towards annotating texts that require more academic rigour (literature, historic documents, news) combined with the brash, public personalities of the owners make me think it will be a bigger problem for these guys than for others. Either way I think a collective "Wait a second..." is long overdue across the board, but that's the optimist in me.