Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sevenzero's commentslogin

Being the only dev in a startup since 2 years without a single day off where I wasn't messaged by my employer I want this. At least I'll have a 3 week out of country trip where I do not bring my laptop later this year...

You should really consider another place to work at, unless you own a massive, measurable chunk of the company in a legally binding way.

The only people who should suffer this much are the true busines owners.


That's exploitation, no? You're just scammed into it, because you let it slide.

Honestly, that is just bad management. It can make sense if it's your company, but even then, the risk profile is just off the charts. What happens if your only developer leaves or gets sick?

Real engineers think about handling things when stuff goes wrong, not "everything will be on the happy path forever".

Yes, there are constraints, but to me this sounds like an unacceptable level of exposure.


I really like this! Also the other things you can find on the website. Cool stuff! Makes me want to get better at Frontend shenanigans.

You can't possibly think those models are only trained on open source data?

This is mostly the result of a lot of vinyl factories having shut down due to vinyl becoming mostly irrelevant after the release of more convenient formats like the CD. At least irrelevant enough to make factories unsustainable. Most modern vinyls have extremely bad quality, I'd even go as far and say almost all freshly produced vinyls. Source: I've worked in a high end luxury HiFi store for years prior to getting into tech, selling turn tables, tube amps, speakers and basically whatever you can think off in that space.

The more time LLMs are a hyped thing now the more I realize how immensely important human expertise is. I recently stopped all usage of LLMs due to this. Skill degradation hits hard, learning effect is zero and the outcome is not really something a person without adequate expertise can properly judge. I fear we will loose a lot of human expertise due to this marketing stunt of a technology.

People often claim learning is actually supercharged with LLMs but to me it's the opposite. I didn't learn anything within the past year.


[flagged]


The irony here that if you ever do any kind of practical woodworking lessons or general hands on craft work, metal working, or any 3D, you will be encouraged to use hand-tools over bandsaws, etc. The reasoning being so you know the fundamentals of what you're trying to achieve with the more complex tools later on.

It's always held true: You'll never get the most out of advanced tools unless you can 'do it by hand' so to speak


I studied computing at AS level in the UK (16-17 years old). I learned about: computer components (disks, memory, cpu), binary, ASCII, assembly and machine code. We programmed in Turbo Pascal. I then spent ten years doing non-computer things until I came back to a masters. I was one of the top students in my masters because i didn't need help with fundamentals. The other top student had previously made contributions to the linux kernel (even though he was a philosophy grad...).

The argument for having autonomous LLMs/Agents often ends up as "none of us need to know about assembly, why do i need to know about the code?".

I cringe every time I see this argument.


You're very close but to woodworking AI is more akin to a 3d printer than even a CNC let alone swas and planes.

Yes, a 3d printer and not even a CNC. That difference nicely illustrates the difference of what AI brings to the table for any domain of competence.


> Sorry, but to me an LLM is nothing but a tool. It is not a replacement for my expertise and it is definitely not something to outsource my thinking to.

Great on you, that's indeed how LLMs should be used, proper. But if anything, the article demonstrates someone is trying to outsource thinking to an AI agent.


Isn't every nuclear bomb an existential threat to all human life? How can one say there are no existential threats while countries people consider "The Enemy" have enough nukes to kill all human life multiple times? Also global warming is an existential threat. It's really telling how little people care about the world's problems not seeing their very own existence endangered.

In the case of Global Warming its happening to slowly for most people to perceive it as threatening. Even though it massively is.

For Nukes thats just a given nowadays, humans have a remarkable ability to adapt to constant threats. Not in the sense of being able to do something against it but to know it exists and not be terrified every single day. So many things can threaten human life that exist around us and yet we do not get scared after some time anymore atleast not constantly. Look at people living in Australia the entire ecosystem is basically a giant threat to anyone living there. Look at people living in earth prone regions of the world. People adapt and keep on living their lives. This is a fundamental human skill.


>People adapt and keep on living their lives.

True! This is precisely what really annoys me about humans, because it makes humans not care about many things, and it's a skill I struggle with, which causes constant anger and helplessness on my side of things. But I guess it's what allows people to have hope and being whimsical, happy and whatnot.


All true, I meant threats in conventional military terms which our military and public rhetoric are all centered around.

Yea I didn't consider the public rhetoric, good catch!

Same to you, trust me I'd be happy if our thinking was more centered around avoiding the real catastrophes that you emphasized.

>Isn't every nuclear bomb an existential threat to all human life?

No, of course not. It's a threat to people within 15 miles of the explosion plus people who are outdoors and turn to look at the bright light in the sky.

And there's never been enough nukes to kill all human life. That statement is based on a despicable calculation in which it is assumed that people would assemble packed shoulder-to-shoulder in circles of just the right size and there are no structures or land masses to deflect the blast and no clouds or fog to absorb the intense light.


Idk I joined the field only like 5 years ago. Prior to knowing about programming I had a lot of respect for programmers and tech as it was this magic world to me. After having joined the field the magic is completely gone and I don't want to talk to programmers irl anymore because of how many insufferable people I've met so far. The parts where I've got credit are the simple things, fix printer, fix computer issue A,B and C or small apps like an ad free Sudoku for android which I have built for my friends. The parts I don't get credit for are the parts I get paid for. But I can see that in many industries, as soon as money is involved people are less thankful because they expect you to fulfill your part of the contract. Generally people not knowing shit about tech think that devs sit in HO all day working only 30 minutes. AI didn't help that image.

Corpo bullshittery is the best kind of work. Get paid without actually ever doing anything. Its heaven.

Being alienated from the outcome of your labor is far from my idea of heaven.

Not if you enjoy making things and take pride in your work.

Actually having to work and take responsibility is extremely exhausting compared to corp life, I experienced both, I currently have no corp job, am responsible for a lot of apps and hate every part of it. Boreout is so much better than burnout and I never worked a job that allowed me to have none of them.

That's some odd image of heaven.

Well game vendors catering game data to the military is the problem here, not the maps themselves. Maps are good, shady corpo bs isn't. Same shit Spotify pulled by investing into war machinery rather than paying the artists more.

What is the difference, in your mind, between mapping data and what was shared?

I really wonder how maintainers get pressured into merging stuff? If they did not want to merge in the first place while having to argue with someone pushing their PR I'd immediately close the PR. Arguing and pressuring people is not a way to contribute to projects, why do maintainers even argue with people?

>why do maintainers even argue with people

Because they don't want to be seen like assholes, who just blindly dismiss PRs, and because they take the technical discussion about the PR in good faith.


On some of those PRs the AI agent (?) did not really pressure - it reacted promptly with changes and more plausible (hallucinated ?) technobabble why the PR is needed.

It can be quite hard to discern this behavior from a new contributor to the project that might be a domain expert on something you are not. Possibly with the exception of reacting far too quickly & enthusiastically compared to real people that might have a life.


Honestly most places on the internet are not places to go into arguments in good faith. Maybe it used to be different, but with the amount of OSS projects being endangered by AI slop contributions, silently closing PRs should be the norm.

If someone gets emotional about their PR being rejected, well... its kinda their issue.


Some people are very susceptible to bullying even if they’re in the position of power.

Have you read the PR discussion?

That makes it look like you're too stupid to understand the PR.

Edit: I see this comment getting downvoted. To be clear, I was trying to explain why someone would want to merge a PR without going through all of it, I didn't mean to call such people stupid.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: