It was only like 1 year ago that the loudest complaint about macOS were complaining about needing to click Allow in a new dialog when they use Terminal (or various other apps).
There are so many comments in here that are calling for nerfing something widely revered for giving us superpowers. Whether these are bots or not, they’re giving off NPC energy.
If they don’t want to use power tools because they accidentally cut off their finger, then they should just unplug their own power tools and stop clamoring for everybody else’s to be unplugged, too.
Hello, are you aware that ALL the software you run on your computer can silently access your clipboard? Have you ever copied sensitive data? Perhaps a password?
Anyway, what I'm asking is a native way to run software in a real sandbox. It's really not a big deal to grant access when asked. Have you used any mobile OSes in the past 20 years? It's the default there and I can be certain that any random utility cannot read my clipboard or user directory without consent.
>> are you aware that ALL the software you run on your computer can silently access your clipboard? Have you ever copied sensitive data?
I use the clipboard regularly and do not use software I don’t trust. If I do run risky software and am compromised, I understand that I took the risk and am responsible for leaving my front door open. Separately but related, I am in favor of severe punishment of the perpetrators of scams and exploitation.
If you want to have walls put around your software, then you have to build them.
I admit I had a knee jerk reaction because I’m frustrated general with a pattern of adults wanting to abdicate responsibility. I apologize for my irreverence. Maybe there is a way the OS can offer these protections you want without nerfing the rest of the world and putting an invisible ceiling on everybody. I think the “Run as Administrator” option in the context menu is pretty elegant. Maybe there could be a “Run in a container” version that excludes access to things like clipboard, external directories, and other non-essential assets. If that is enough to stem the desire to spread the “protective” reach of the machines of loving grace, then you have my vote.
What I DON’T want is to be prompted by the OS every time I want to paste something into a 3rd party app. Think about how much more momentum that gives the platforms to portray 3rd party software as potentially untrustworthy. At the risk of mind-reading, I don’t think that is a world that you would want to live in. I hope that people are more considerate of the potential downsides before they wish for these changes.
> If they don’t want to use power tools because they accidentally cut off their finger, then they should just unplug their own power tools and stop clamoring for everybody else’s to be unplugged, too.
Sadly, the pendulum keeps swinging in the way of the tools actually being unplugged and dumbed down in favor of these screaming people, rather than leaving things alone so the rest of us professionals can continue to (safely) do our jobs with the already somewhat restricted tools we have.
The article you cited does not agree with your assertions. It specifically tells you how and when to evaluate the use of an anonymous source.
If you don't ever use anonymous sources, many fewer people will talk to you. Being on the record about something that will get you fired, will get you fired - and then no one talks to journalists.
What separates actual ethical journalists from the rest is doing everything the article you cited suggests - validating information with alternative sources, understanding motives, etc.
You don't have to use every single source you talk to in your article though. Sure, I will grant my neighbor's dog anonymity but I won't include his opinion in my article at all.
They mean it doesn't sit around and wait until it's hot, which then makes it "used" and unable to cool something else. It keeps moving through the first chip and is only a small percent saturated.
depends how fasts it is moving - but it's all moving at the same speed. The last chip will get less cooling than the first chip, proportional to the amount of cooling the previous chips received. Delta T doesn't lie.
Whether it's significant or not, I can't know - but you want it to be significant, otherwise it's less efficient.
It moves fast enough that the temperature delta between first and last chip isn't significant. Not too fast, though, because if the pump is running full-tilt it becomes a major heat-source itself.
> but you want it to be significant, otherwise it's less efficient.
No? You want a large delta between heat-source and water, as well as water and whatever is on your cool side. Essentially just between hot and cold sides.
Delta between heat-sources is irrelevant unless you start cherry-picking some very odd combinations.
> depends how fasts it is moving - but it's all moving at the same speed. The last chip will get less cooling than the first chip, proportional to the amount of cooling the previous chips received. Delta T doesn't lie.
The watts of cooling per chip will be the same. The last chip in the loop will be a little warmer, but not by much in a reasonable setup. The difference in temperature between each chip and the water running across it will be the same.
And if you take a weak water supply and then split it to run in parallel, you can end up with a significant heat gradient across each waterblock which doesn't sound great either. If you have 4 high power chips please don't limit them to .25 liters per minute each.
> Whether it's significant or not, I can't know - but you want it to be significant, otherwise it's less efficient.
Keeping your fluid cool is good for long term reliability. And if you're doing that, then every block is getting cool fluid and the other details about loop layout won't matter.
that's a pretty localized in time issue re: used cars. There's still covid supply issues being felt in the downstream used market as a result of underproduction for 2+ years.
It's certainly niche, but NY-LON sees ~3 million non-connecting passengers a year.
If they can make it quiet enough to be supersonic over land, it's a lot more compelling. But even being supersonic for the atlantic crossing will shave hours off of most EU routes from NY.
I think the bigger problem is the time changes on a lot of routes make EU flights pretty efficient - you don't want the overnight flights to be shorter really (and I wish most were longer).
Maybe overnight flights should optionally let you sleep on the ground before/after the flight. Charge extra, you don't have to pay pilots or for fuel, park away from the gate.
You would need power without the engines but you could hook up a generator or a feed from the airport.
I've been on redeye flights where, a few hours in, the pilot came on the PA, told us about something to see out the window, and also about the drink we could buy from the flight attendants - credit cards only please!
Air travel is just endless indignities and discomfort.
If China is anything to go by, immensely more so, and you are not significantly helped even if you had all the documents and industry secrets required to design and build a modern engine!
This is Qualcomm's big business (and others), getting their patents into standards like 5G and then charging people a fair amount to use it - and they have to license it to everyone, even their arch nemesis. Or you just buy their chips.
For a patent of something you invented, but did not submit to become part of a standards-body, you absolutely can choose not to license it for any amount of money.
I'd assume that when you have IPv6, the majority of your traffic (in bytes) will be IPv6 simply because all the CDNs and big video services do support IPv6.
Once my router at home crashed in a way that IPv4 stopped working but IPv6 kept on working and it was actually kind hard to figure out what went wrong because so much of the internet still worked fine.
Thats also six year old data; a lot has happened since, especially outside the US. For example european connectivity rate has doubled, and the top 1000 websites is close to 50% now which is also almost double that of 2018.
