I have not, do not, and will continue to not allow my data to be used for AI training... Yet for some reason my blog website is still scraped by some AI data slurper every 10 seconds. If 99% of people don't care (or know) about their data being ingested, it doesn't justify the scraping, because there is still a (rightly infuriated) 1% who do care.

fully agree. cant even started to read this. just skipped directly.

Google treats its customers so blindly. in short, Google is not user centric company at all.

Google treats its customers like a monopolist.

Google treats its customers the way a cattle rancher treats his cattle.

You should take your ad viewing elsewhere in protest.

Yep. Straight to the pie hole.

Used to be you'd say Google was bad because the users weren't the customers, the advertisers were. Nowadays even the advertisers aren't the customers. They only customers Google has anymore are the shareholders.

First they need fix their ai based tools. Paid users of Google AI are exhausted from Google.

Task success is not enough; reliability and cost matter.

Agent systems become most credible when they produce artifacts that can be independently checked, not when they merely produce persuasive explanations.

This is not only a fairness problem. It is an agent-memory problem: a system can mistake its own early choices for evidence.

When a web page, email, or document is marked untrusted, does that label persist through summaries and tool calls?

It is useful architecture tool.

"Reply on HN" thing doesnt work?