take other people's work and sell it back to them

the future is now

this feels like it was written by someone who has been out of the dating scene for a while now

dating apps suck, your UI/UX can groundbreaking but that doesn't make them any less awful to use

This "AI is inevitable" mood that people are in always seem to come from people who don't have to use the things AI is supposedly going to replace, and never consider what the actual consequences of that might be

I live in a city and I still feel like my best bet to meet someone is on the apps because they have taken out a lot of the old ways that people used to meet. How do you even approach a potential date? IDK and it sucks.

Original Tinder was the best dating app UI. I was single at the time, looking for a real relationship instead of hookups, but still. All the copies made it complicated for no reason, and even Tinder suffered feature creep. Then bots infiltrated all of them.

1st link is broken

Nick Hitchon was a professor of mine in college. He seemed like a genuinely very nice guy and took the time to learn everyone's name, despite how large the classes were.

that is what bsky and other twitter-like platforms purport to be

how well they hold up under stress of bad actors/govts remains to be seen

no i mean a replacement for nitter and xcancel

there's still a lot of info you can only find on twitter

thank you kind stranger

Repost it on the fediverse

Some context for what was happening in the US at the time:

Anatomy of a Scare: Yellow Peril Politics in America, 1980–1993

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40464347

> Nearby Grand Chute canceled its Flock deal in early June, switching to a competing product from Axon. Grand Chute Police Chief David Maas told Fox 11 News that the Axon system “benefits the community in multiple ways and also respects resident privacy in a way that feels more comfortable, quite honestly.”

They're just trading one problem for another

> Look, I get it. It’s Q3 2026, and we should expect that everyone is utilizing AI at SOME point in their process (sourcing ideas, creating outlines, refining prose, etc.)

How do people not realize how up their own @$$ they sound when they say things like this

One thing I don't understand here, isn't "refining prose" exactly the thing the author is calling out against?