Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | throw0101c's commentslogin

> So what were they requesting $200 Billion for?

That request was over a month ago and perhaps based on estimates using an operation tempo that was high. After the initial outburst, things may have slowed down.

That said, a lot of missiles were used, which, under current production rates, will take years to replenish: some 'extra' money may be needed to pay for production ramp up to get replacements sooner.


> based on estimates using an operation tempo that was high

So they were expecting those high tempos to continue for months?

> That said, a lot of missiles were used, which, under current production rates, will take years to replenish: some 'extra' money may be needed to pay for production ramp up to get replacements sooner.

8X is a heck of an expedite fee.


Somewhat related: "Here Is What Trump’s Gargantuan $1.5T Defense Budget Has In It":

* https://www.twz.com/air/here-is-what-trumps-gargantuan-1-5t-...

That's $500B more than last year's budget, and:

> > Trump’s budget proposal represents the largest yearly military spending plan in U.S. history, exceeding the previous record of $1.2 trillion during World War II, when adjusted for inflation. And records confirm the DNC’s characterization of the increase being the largest since WWII when inflation is factored in.

* https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2026/apr/20/democratic...


> […] or the US has to sit and watch the world plunge into recession and Asian countries in particular are going to burn.

Perhaps worth noting that the US is not unscathed in this, as oil/petroleum is a global market that includes the US. US domestic gas pump prices (which is input into everything, including groceries) go up when global oil prices go up. Not to mention things like fertilize (and, as a lot of people suddenly found out, the importance of helium).

And it's not like the US can practically stop exports, as a lot what the US produces can't be processed by their own refineries (at least at prices palatable to the consumer).

* https://blog.drillingmaps.com/2025/06/this-is-why-us-cant-us...

So it's not wrong to say that the world may end up in a global recession, and Asian countries have more acute problems that will hit sooner than the US, but the US will also face those issues if things drag on.


Meta: the HN code should perhaps be tweaked so that *.sa submissions can handle three-level domains, as the 'base' for anything seems to be two-level (like X.uk):

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.sa#Second-level_domains

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.edu_(second-level_domain)

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ac_(second-level_domain)



Is there any irony in cold research coming out of Saudi Arabia?

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia#Geography


Interestingly, the article says that gallium oxide electronics can operate in extreme heat too, up to 500ºC.

> Republicans advocate for fiscal responsibility -- never happens. Democrats advocate for things like healthcare and cancelling student loans -- never happens.

From what I've seen, Republicans don't bother trying. Democrats try and get blocked by the GOP; not sure if they can 'try harder' or find ways around the blocking. Biden certainly tried on student loans and got shot down:

* https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/white-house-press-...

After trying to be bi-partisan with the ACA/Obamacare the Democrats just went forward with it



Apple docs say iOS 26/macOS 26, that's so brand new that no apps are using it right now, will have to check that again in a few years.

> William Gibson's now defunct micro blog

Isn't that what X/Twitter basically is (was?), a "micro blog"?

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging


His posts were typically slightly longer than twitter. "Miniblog"? Topic + 2-5 sentences.

Also, he's a published writer... so that's another substantial difference with average twitter.


It is from Pensées, 139:

> Diversion.—When I have occasionally set myself to consider the different distractions of men, the pains and perils to which they expose themselves at court or in war, whence arise so many quarrels, passions, bold and often bad ventures, etc., I have discovered that all the unhappiness of men arises from one single fact, that they cannot stay quietly in their own chamber. A man who has enough to live on, if he knew how to stay with pleasure at home, would not leave it to go to sea or to besiege a town. A commission in the army would not be bought so dearly, but that it is found insufferable not to budge from the town; and men only seek conversation and entering games, because they cannot remain with pleasure at home.

> But on further consideration, when, after finding the cause of all our ills, I have sought to discover the reason of it, I have found that there is one very real reason, namely, the natural poverty of our feeble and mortal condition, so miserable that nothing can comfort us when we think of it closely.

> Whatever condition we picture to ourselves, if we muster all the good things which it is possible to possess, royalty is the finest position in the world. Yet, when we imagine a king attended with every pleasure he can feel, if he be without diversion, and be left to consider and reflect on what he is, this feeble happiness will not sustain him; he will necessarily fall into forebodings of dangers, of revolutions which may happen, and, finally, of death and inevitable disease; so that if he be without what is called diversion, he is unhappy, and more unhappy than the least of his subjects who plays and diverts himself.

> Hence it comes that play and the society of women, war, and high posts, are so sought after. Not that there is in fact any happiness in them, or that men imagine true bliss to consist in money won at play, or in the hare which they hunt; we would not take these as a gift. We do not seek that easy and peaceful lot which permits us to think of our unhappy condition, nor the dangers of war, nor the labour of office, but the bustle which averts these thoughts of ours, and amuses us.

> Reasons why we like the chase better than the quarry.

> Hence it comes that men so much love noise and stir; hence it comes that the prison is so horrible a punishment; hence it comes that the pleasure of solitude is a thing incomprehensible. And it is in fact the greatest source of happiness in the condition of kings, that men try incessantly to divert them, and to procure for them all kinds of pleasures.

> The king is surrounded by persons whose only thought is to divert the king, and to prevent his thinking of self. For he is unhappy, king though he be, if he think of himself.

> This is all that men have been able to discover to make themselves happy. And those who philosophise on the matter, and who think men unreasonable for spending a whole day in chasing a hare which they would not have bought, scarce know our nature. The hare in itself would not screen us from the sight of death and calamities; but the chase which turns away our attention from these, does screen us.

[…]

* https://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h/18269-h.htm

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pensées



> i find it hard to believe that there is no equivalent anywhere else in the world. there is so much talent out there and the stakes are so high that it seems like an inevitability.

Well, even jet engine manufacturing is something that China is behind in (relatively speaking), and it (seems?) is simpler than some of the stuff in EUV machines.


> and it (seems?) is simpler than some of the stuff in EUV machines.

It probably is. But it's probably in the same category of being one of the most difficult things to manufacture.


yeah but maybe there the stakes are not as high. although i guess it touches the military and so it might be

The stakes may not be considered as high for jet engines, but the problems may also be (relatively) easier too.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: