The book of Revelation doesn't mention any antichrist. Only the epistles of John mention antichrists and the definition of what they are. Any proposed link between any antichrists and the book of Revelation was created in the past few hundred years.
> Any proposed link between any antichrists and the book of Revelation was created in the past few hundred years.
Actually, the idea of an end times Antichrist has been around for much of Christianity's history.
Irenaeus of Lyon synthesized the beast of Revelation (which is what most people conflate with "The Antichrist"), Daniel's imagery, and Paul's "man of lawlessness" (2 Thess. 2) into a composite end-times figure back around 180 CE in his work "Against Heresies". Additionally, Hippolytus of Rome also wrote an entire treatise, "On Christ and Antichrist", back in early 200 CE, that also explored that relevant symbolism in the Old and New Testaments.
For context, both Irenaeus and Hippolytus are considered among the most important of the early Church Fathers.
Some of the ideas have been around a long time but they weren't integrated together into a whole until over a hundred years ago by John Nelson Darby and was then were popularized by the Schofield Reference Bible 1 hundred years ago.
Canadians do not elect parties. We elect Members of Parliament. This is why it is democratic for MPs to cross the floor from one party to another. It has happened over 300 times since Canada became a country.
If an MP is not free to vote in the best interests of their constituents, and rather has to vote along party lines, then the failure of democracy has already occurred. Crossing the floor, in order to act in the best interest of your constituents, is a big move that one doesn't decide on overnight.
We should be more tolerant of individual MPs not always siding with their team, without them having the fear of being removed from their caucus.
Notice how none of the floor crossings happened right after the election. They took time, they saw how government was working, and they took action based on their experience.
After 12 years of three Republican presidents (1921-1933), bringing about the Great Depression the last of which, Hoover, taking a hand off approach which didn't help, there were 20 years of two Democrat presidents (1933-1953). Not even one generation.
That's false. The Amiga could run the Mac OS better than any Mac could, even with the same CPU because of the Amiga custom chips. Also, Amigas had faster CPUs available than the Macs did, and the Amiga OS was still multitasking in the background.
reply