Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tipperjones's commentslogin

Cause it's not 5 min max


People are really good at finding virtue within themselves


It feels like you really wanted to shoehorn the communion hot dog line in there.


I've found the opposite, Lightning cables routinely failed for me and I haven't had a USB-C cable fail yet, and I've been using them for 7+ years.

Not sure if it's the connector or the build quality, but want to throw in the opposite experience.


I just had to buy more type-C cables because all of mine are broken - always at the cable entering the connector, and I don't coil them tightly - but I've never used Lightning.


In case you don’t do this already, avoid:

- Pulling on the cable to unplug it, instead ensure you pull on the solid connector on the end.

- Bending at the point of the cable connector, resting the phone upright on the cable + connector when plugged in (e.g. in cup holder in a car) or stretching the cable too long that it causes a bend in the cable at the connector when plugged in.

There was a recent HN post about cable abuse and it said coiling too tight doesn’t itself damage cables (I will add I don’t like how it makes the cable get a memory and wants to kind of recoil itself all the time), but I think the action of too tight coiling incidentally puts more stress on where it joins the connector.


The cables fail from bad design.

The connectors are great.


Aren't there high quality cables available? Eg from companies like Apple or Anker?

I struggle to understand why an Apple lightning cable would be more robust than an Apple thunderbolt cable...


Well at least the metal part of any type-C plug will inherently be more fragile due to the hollow design and manufacturing by stamping out of sheet metal. Whereas for Lightning, it’s a solid machined part.

But as soon as you get to the chip housing and the rest of the cable, it’s anyone’s game I suppose.


You said there are three traits, but seems like you only listed two - unless you're counting strength and dexterity as separate and just worded it weirdly.


I think they’re separate. You don’t need to be strong or intelligent to put circuit boards in printers, but there are factories full of people doing that. Purely because it’s currently cheaper to pay (low) wages to humans than to develop, deploy, and maintain automation to do that task. Yet.


AI will improve people’s understanding of the Oxford comma.


It’s only equal if you consider two outcomes: some risk and no risk.

And there’s always some risk.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: