What did you use to make that chart? It looks really nice. Its the first time I've see these ASCII boxes on HN without gaps in the border.

>Can you define what "reacting" means exactly in a shooter

A human can't really, which is why you need to bring in ML. Feed it enough game states of legit players vs known cheaters, and it will be able to find patterns.

There is no need for ML. Games arent the real world.

A suitable game engine would have knowledge of when a shadow, player, grenade, noise, or other reactable event occurs for a given client.

Especially if games arent processed in real time but processed later based on a likelihood of cheating drawn from other stats.

And what happens to that pattern, when the cheat engine adjusts? What happens to the enraged players that got wrongly banned for cheating?

Yeah, that's why you need a data scientist or two to figure that stuff out. Its a solvable problem, but you're not going to get solutions instantly for free in the reply section of HN.

But in the reply section you can read about that it has been tried in reality, with not so much success as in theory. But if you see a working solution, then you don't need to tell me, but can market it yourself.

If anyone is wrongly banned the system is too sensitive. Let it capture data for a month before banning someone. Ensure the confidence is crazy high.

Fireworks supports this model serverless for $1.20 per million tokens.

https://fireworks.ai/models/fireworks/deepseek-v3p2

That's the final, fine-tuned model. The base model (pretraining only, no instruction SFT, RLHF, RLVR etc) is this one: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp-Base It's apparently not offered at any inference provider, nor are older DeepSeek base models.

I've never had issues with Debian based distros.

There's already the new musical, Slam Frank, which gives the story of Ann Frank the Hamilton treatment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slam_Frank

`rm -rf /` will refuse to delete the root folder. You can see an example of it doing that here.

https://phoenixnap.com/kb/sudo-rm-rf

This was the D drive though, not root, ie C drive. So rm -rf would happily delete it all.

this is not always true. this is a dangerous fun fact to memorize.

and i don't mean because there's an override flag.

Just to be clear, the anti-cheat systems that support Linux run at the user level and don't require secure boot. Those kernel-level and secure boot restrictions only apply to a handful of games, and they all explicitly block Linux users anyway. For example, I've been playing Arc Raiders a lot recently in Linux, and the user-level EAC works just fine.

The user-level cheats are extremely bad. For example, Elden Ring uses EZ Anti-Cheat and it works on linux and that game is infested with PvP cheaters.

> ...Elden Ring uses EZ Anti-Cheat and it works on linux and that game is infested with PvP cheaters.

I would question how good Elden Ring's use of EAC actually is.

Given that -at launch-

* Players who were using a Japanese locale couldn't play the game unless they removed EAC

* Removing EAC substantially reduced the amount of incredibly noticeable hitching and stuttering

my hunch is that EAC was hastily slapped on very, very late in the process due to demands from some US-based PHB.

If you're on a Linux or Mac computer which uses CUPS, its pretty easy.

The $15 plan notably does not come with DDoS protection though.

This is not true. Even the Free plan has DDoS protection. L3/L4 (TCP SYN floods, UDP reflection attacks and similar) filtering is built-in and always-on, by default. CloudFront terminates TLS, and only forwards valid HTTP(S) requests to cache / origin.

The "Always-on DDoS Protection" on L7 is protection against massive requests spikes, built natively into CloudFront. Detection and mitigation of these attacks happens inline.

The "Advanced DDoS Protection" on L7 is adjustable, score-based DDoS protection configurable on AWS WAF (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/networking-and-content-delivery...). Detection and mitigation of these attacks happens within seconds.

the pricing page says it comes with "Always-on DDoS Protection" but not "Advanced DDoS Protection"

I have no idea what these terms mean in practice

>Instead of what?

Instead of a different cookie pop-up on every single site you visit

>Instead of the central browser controls?

This is the central browser control. The header is how the browser communicates it to the websites.

This very article is about how we're getting a central browser control, and your comment was "can we finally get a central browser control instead?".

Well, it's a minor details hidden in the middle of the article, I also missed it.

But the person weberer replied to was quoting the exact place.

whoops, didn't read the entire quote ...