Sure you will lose a little bit, like 2 or 3% a year. But if you have nothing saved then what will you do in case of an emergency? such as losing a job?
* Cigarettes are stimulants and feel great when they first kick in, like a good cup of coffee.
* Smoking gives you a culturally-approved reason to take breaks throughout the day and go outside.
* Smoking is a social activity that provides an easy way to meet new people.
Of course, it is strongly chemically addictive too with serious negative health consequences, but the reason people smoke isn't only addiction or no one would ever start. I learned the above list by once genuinely asking someone why they smoke.
Let's be honest. 90% of JS developers out there probably don't even know what a lock is.
I know a JS dev who gets paid good money to develop software, who thought the reason you shouldn't use floating-point to deal with currency was because "javascript is bugged".
There's a certain survivorship bias at work, but I see old people around with plenty of energy. I think many use lack of energy as a plausible excuse when they're really just lazy.
I guess it depends on your customer model, but surely the keyword there is "begin"?
It all depends on your customer/business model. If you're expecting to get to 1000s of clients quickly (i.e. within 12 months), then this will be an ops nightmare, unless you have really good automation.
AFAIK, historically that hasn't happened. Sales is shit hard. Getting every single client is an art in itself. You got to be a magician to get even 5-10 clients signed-up readily in one go, for a start-up. And by the time you are having "N" paying clients that matches your metric for product-market fitness, you start evolving your architecture to the next level. This is where Product and Engineering sit-together to take that strategic decision on the path forward.
>Nobody likes to be told that they're wasting their free time,
Wasting free time, a.k.a living? Capitalist propaganda is so godamn effective. People now believe that every minute you spend not working is wasted time.
That's not what the original sentence says at all.
Every minute spent not working is free time, that's pretty much true no matter how much work you do.
And you can use that free time to actually live, i.e. have deep, meaningful experiences, or waste it by consuming cheap, addictive and mostly fake content on the social network du jour.
Well, the article makes it look like striving for accomplishment necessarily makes you miserable, and makes the comparison to alcoholism. If so, it's a very deeply buried, unconscious misery: alcoholics wake up and go to sleep feeling horrible and will tell you out loud that they're miserable whenever they're sober and wish that they could stop feeling so awful. Pursuing excellence doesn't (in and of itself) ravage your body or destroy your sleep.
I'm fascinated by computers, and I like to spend time learning more about them. This doesn't make me miserable, it makes me happy (and, lucky for me, I can turn this into money too). It does make the people around me uncomfortable: they figure that if they were reading a book about programming computers, they would be miserable, so they try to talk me out of "punishing" myself.
Corollary to this, though: you can (with a lot of caveats) choose to be happy. Or, at least, commit to finding and pursuing the path(s) that will get you closer.
It can (and does) take a lot more work than sitting in the familiar rut of misery. Sometimes, this involves doctors and pharmaceuticals, but, either way, requires a lot of work on the part of the individual.
The process of starting this work when you are already overwhelmed is a big problem. Try to rig the game in your favor and be realistic about whether you can benefit from outside help.
Sure you will lose a little bit, like 2 or 3% a year. But if you have nothing saved then what will you do in case of an emergency? such as losing a job?